HARTLAND, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: SJOBERG TOOL AND MANUFACTURING CORP.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SJOBERG TOOL AND MANUFACTURING CORP. in 535 SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, HARTLAND, WI 53029 (NAICS 332116). OSHA activity number 337581615.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SJOBERG TOOL AND MANUFACTURING CORP.
- Site address
- 535 SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
- City
- HARTLAND
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53029
- Mailing
- 535 SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, HARTLAND, WI 53029
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332116
- Employees
- 71
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment: (a) Employees were exposed to laceration hazards while working sheet metal and the employer did not ensure that employees were trained on the gloves available and the limitations of the gloves available.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $2975
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: (a) Employees were exposed to caught-in and crushing hazards while servicing and maintaining equipment and the employer did not develop procedures for the control of potentially hazardous energy.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $4900
- · Z (S) $4900
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct an annual or more frequent inspection of the energy control procedure to ensure that the procedure and requirements of this standard were followed: (a) Employees were exposed to caught-in and crushing hazards while servicing and maintaining equipment and the employer did not conduct at least an annual inspection of the energy control procedures to ensure that the procedures and requirements of the standard were followed.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2975
1910.179 J02
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2): Frequent inspection. The following items shall be inspected for defects at intervals as defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii) of this section or as specifically indicated, including observation during operation for any defects which might appear between regular inspections. All deficiencies such as listed shall be carefully examined and determination made as to whether they constitute a safety hazard: (a) Employees were exposed to crushing hazards while using overhead cranes and the employer did not ensure that frequent (at least monthly) inspection were being performed on the cranes.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1500
- · Z (S) $2975
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): (a) Employees were exposed to amputation hazards while operating the AccurShear (Model #62506 and Serial #5234) and the employer did not ensure that the operator was properly guarded from the point of operation. (b) Employees were exposed to amputations hazards while operating the Wells Metal Band Saw (Model #600 and Serial #10131), which was located in the weld shop, and the employer did not ensure that the operator was properly guarded from the unused portion of the blade. (c) Employees were exposed to amputations hazards while operating the Jet Horizontal Band Saw (Model # and Serial # could not be determined), which was located in the weld shop, and the employer did not ensure that the operator was properly guarded from the unused portion of the blade.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $4900
More inspections at Sjoberg Tool and Manufacturing Corp.
View Sjoberg Tool and Manufacturing Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332116)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 337581615.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.