Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FXI

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FXI in 5050 F STREET, OMAHA, NE 68117 (NAICS 326150). OSHA activity number 337598213.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch FXI — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for FXI is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FXI
Site address
5050 F STREET
City
OMAHA
State
NE
ZIP
68117
Mailing
5050 F STREET, OMAHA, NE 68117
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326150
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2013
Abate by
Feb 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(e)(1):     Standard railing(s) did not consist of top rail, intermediate rail and/or posts and/or did not have a vertical height of 42 inches (106.7 cm) nominal from upper surface of top rail to floor, platform runway, or ramp level:    The employer is failing to protect employees from potential fall hazards associated with inadequate guard rails installed along the open sides of a stairway.  This was most recently evident during the inspection of the facility located at 5050 F Street, Omaha, NE 68117, where the employer has employees using the stairway in the warehouse/production area to access the storage above the offices and the guard railing currently installed is missing a mid-rail along its entire length.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.178 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2013
Abate by
Feb 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(g)(2):     Battery charging apparatus for industrial trucks located in battery changing and charging installation was not protected from damage by trucks:(a)(LOCATION)(IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)(DESCRIBE HAZARDS WHERE NECESSARY)    The employer is failing to protect employees from potential electrical hazards associated with having the battery charging station located in a position where it is not protected against accidental damage from forklifts.  This was most recently evident during the inspection of warehouse located at 5050 F Street, Omaha, NE 68117, where the employer has the battery charging station sitting on the floor between two loading dock doors, unprotected from accidental damage as a result of being struck from forklifts operating in the immediate area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2013
Abate by
Feb 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A):     Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:    The employer is failing to protect employees from potential electrical hazards associated with using temporary flexible cords in lieu of permanent wiring.  This was most recently evident during the inspection of facility located at 5050 F Street, Omaha, NE 68117, where the employer is using an extension cord as a permanent method of providing power to a label maker thus exposing the wiring not designed for consistent use to excessive wear and tear.  Instances include but are not limited to:    i.  Running the cord from an outlet located on the other side of a doorway by laying the cord under a rug in front of an exit door.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.147 C06 II

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2013
Abate by
Feb 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(ii):     The employer did not certify that periodic inspections of the energy control procedures had been performed:    The employer is failing to protect employees from potential amputation and electrical hazards associated with not certifying that the periodic review of energy control procedures have been performed annually.  This was most recently evident during the inspection of the facility located at 5050 F Street, Omaha, NE 68117, where the employer has employees locking out equipment using written specific procedures that have no certification as to when they were last reviewed and by whom.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View FXI's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337598213.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.