Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AMILICAR SAMPER PEREZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AMILICAR SAMPER PEREZ in 28 ANDERSON AVENUE, MILFORD, CT 06460 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 337613822.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Amilicar Samper Perez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Amilicar Samper Perez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
28 ANDERSON AVENUE
City
MILFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06460
Mailing
22 PAGE STREET, MILFORD, CT 06460
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2013
Abate by
Jan 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $2,200
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.    WORKSITE: The side rails of the Werner model D1216-2 1 6 foot aluminum extension ladder, used by employees to access the roof did not extend at least three feet above the roof eave.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2200

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2013
Abate by
Jan 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders shall be used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder is approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support).    WORKSITE: The Werner model D1216-2 1 6 foot aluminum extension ladder, used by employees to access the roof, was set up at an angle where the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder exceeded one-quarter the working length of the ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B22

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2013
Abate by
Jan 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $3,080
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): An employee shall not carry any object or load that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall.     WORKSITE: The employees were manually carrying roofing materials up the  Werner model D1216-2 1 6 foot aluminum extension ladder and onto the roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2013
Abate by
Feb 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $2,200
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary. The program shall enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways, and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.    WORKSITE: The employees using an extension ladder to access the roof and to carry materials onto the roof were not provided with training in the hazards associated with ladders, or the procedures necessary to eliminate or minimize those hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2200

1926.102 A01

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2013
Abate by
Jan 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $11,000 · Current $11,000
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    WORKSITE: The employee, installing roofing materials with a pneumatic nailing device was not wearing eye protection.    Amilicar Samper Perez dba Roof Systems of Connecticut was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 109174482, citation number 2, item number 1, affirmed as a final order on 10/28/2009 with respect to a workplace located at 9 Washington Avenue, Hamden, CT 06518.     Amilicar Samper Perez dba Roof Systems of Connecticut was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard (29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 311931737, citation number 1, item number 1, affirmed as a final order on  11/25/2008, with respect to a workplace located at 188  Clark Street, Milford, CT 06460
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $11000

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2013
Abate by
Jan 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $15,400 · Current $15,400
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure.     WORKSITE: The employees conducting roofing activities on a residential roof with 4/12 and 7/12 pitches were not wearing fall protection, exposing the employees to falls between 8 feet, 4 inches and 11 feet, 2 inches.    Amilicar Samper Perez dba Roof Systems of Connecticut was previously cited for a violation of an equivalent occupational safety and health standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 109174482, citation number 2, item number 2, affirmed as a final order on 10/28/2009 with respect to a workplace located at 9 Washington Avenue, Hamden, CT 06518.     Amilicar Samper Perez dba Roof Systems of Connecticut was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard (29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 311931737, citation number 1, item number 7, affirmed as a final order on  11/25/2008, with respect to a workplace located at 188  Clark Street, Milford, CT 06460.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $15400

1926.503 A01

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2013
Abate by
Feb 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $11,000 · Current $11,000
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.    WORKSITE: The employees, engaged in roofing activities on a residential roof were not provided training in the recognition of hazards associated with falls, or the procedures necessary to eliminate or minimize those hazards.     Amilicar Samper Perez dba Roof Systems of Connecticut was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 109174482, citation number 2, item number 4, affirmed as a final order on 10/28/2009 with respect to a workplace located at 9 Washington Avenue, Hamden, CT 06518.     Amilicar Samper Perez dba Roof Systems of Connecticut was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard (29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1)), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 311931737, citation number 1, item number 6b, affirmed as a final order on  11/25/2008, with respect to a workplace located at 188  Clark Street, Milford, CT 06460.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $11000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337613822.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.