NOCONA, TX —
OSHA Inspection: NOCONA NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of NOCONA NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER in 306 CAROLYN ROAD, NOCONA, TX 76255 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 337624225.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NOCONA NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER
- Site address
- 306 CAROLYN ROAD
- City
- NOCONA
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76255
- Mailing
- 306 CAROLYN ROAD, NOCONA, TX 76255
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 623110
- Employees
- 50
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- May 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment: On or about November 27, 2012, the employer did not have a written certification for personal protective equipment required in the facility. Employees were provided personal protective equipment, such as, but not limited to gloves. The employees were exposed to skin and respiratory hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1680
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.151 C
- Issued
- May 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: On or about November 27, 2012, the employer did not provide an adequate eyewash station in the kitchen. Employees were using corrosives, such as, but not limited to Ecotemp Phase 1 Detergent 2, containing sodium hydroxide. The employees were exposed to a burn hazard.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1030 C01 II B
- Issued
- May 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii)(B): The employer's Exposure Control Plan did not include the schedule and method of implementation for 29 CFR 1910.1030(g), Communication of Hazards to Employees and 29 CFR 1910.1030(h), Recordkeeping: On or about November 27, 2012, at this facility where employees were exposed to blood or other potentially infectious materials during procedures such as, but not limited to changing bandages and dressings.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1680
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1030 F01 I
- Issued
- May 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(i): The employer did not make available the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series to all employees who have occupational exposure: On or about November 27, 2012 the employer did not provide the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series. Employees were exposed to blood or other potentially infectious materials during procedures such as, but not limited to changing bandages and dressings.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1680
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1030 F03
- Issued
- May 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(3): Following a report of an exposure incident, the employer did not make immediately available to the exposed employee a confidential medical evaluation or follow-up: On or about November 27, 2012, the employer did not have specific procedures for the evaluation of circumstances surrounding exposure incidents. Employees were exposed to blood or other potentially infectious materials during procedures such as, but not limited to changing bandages and dressings.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1680
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- May 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about November 27, 2012, the employer did not develop a written hazard communication program. Employees were using chemicals, such as, but not limited to Ecotemp Phase 1 Detergent 2. The employees were exposed to a respiratory and burn hazard.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1680
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 623110)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337624225.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.