Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NOCONA NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of NOCONA NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER in 306 CAROLYN ROAD, NOCONA, TX 76255 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 337624225.

Watch Nocona Nursing AND Rehabilitation Center — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nocona Nursing AND Rehabilitation Center is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
306 CAROLYN ROAD
City
NOCONA
State
TX
ZIP
76255
Mailing
306 CAROLYN ROAD, NOCONA, TX 76255
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
623110
Employees
50
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2013
Abate by
Jun 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:    On or about November 27, 2012, the employer did not have a written certification for personal protective equipment required in the facility.  Employees were provided personal protective equipment, such as, but not limited to gloves. The employees were exposed to skin and respiratory hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1680
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.151 C

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2013
Abate by
Jun 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c):  Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:   On or about November 27, 2012, the employer did not provide an adequate eyewash station in the kitchen. Employees were using corrosives, such as, but not limited to Ecotemp Phase 1 Detergent 2, containing sodium hydroxide. The employees were exposed to a burn hazard.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1030 C01 II B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2013
Abate by
Jun 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii)(B): The employer's Exposure Control Plan did not include the schedule and method of implementation for 29 CFR 1910.1030(g), Communication of Hazards to Employees and 29 CFR 1910.1030(h), Recordkeeping:       On or about November 27, 2012, at this facility where employees were exposed to blood or other potentially infectious materials during procedures such as, but not limited to changing bandages and dressings.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1680
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1030 F01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2013
Abate by
Jun 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(i): The employer did not make available the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series to all employees who have occupational exposure:    On or about November 27, 2012 the employer did not provide the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series.  Employees were exposed to blood or other potentially infectious materials during procedures such as, but not limited to changing bandages and dressings.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1680
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1030 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2013
Abate by
Jun 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(3): Following a report of an exposure incident, the employer did not make immediately available to the exposed employee a confidential medical evaluation or follow-up:      On or about November 27, 2012, the employer did not have specific procedures for the evaluation of circumstances surrounding exposure incidents.  Employees were exposed to blood or other potentially infectious materials during procedures such as, but not limited to changing bandages and dressings.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1680
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2013
Abate by
Jun 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:      On or about November 27, 2012, the employer did not develop a written hazard communication program.  Employees were using chemicals, such as, but not limited to Ecotemp Phase 1 Detergent 2. The employees were exposed to a respiratory and burn hazard.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1680
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337624225.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.