WATERBURY, CT —
OSHA Inspection: ROSA HOME IMPROVEMENT, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROSA HOME IMPROVEMENT, LLC in 1981 EAST MAIN ST., WATERBURY, CT 06705 (NAICS 238350). OSHA activity number 337635619.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ROSA HOME IMPROVEMENT, LLC
- Site address
- 1981 EAST MAIN ST.
- City
- WATERBURY
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06705
- Mailing
- 107 RANSOM HALL RD., WOLCOTT, CT 06716
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238350
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Feb 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 13, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift. Worksite: The employee who was working from an aerial lift basket was not wearing a full body harness with the lanyard attached to the basket or boom.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1100
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Feb 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 13, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels and 50-feet (15.25 m) wide or less, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety nets or a monitor system. Worksite: The employee who was working on low sloped roof with an eave height of approximately 13 feet 10 inches above the ground was not protected from fall hazards by the use guardrails, safety nets a personal fall arrest system or a monitoring system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1700
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Feb 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Worksite: The employee who was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 13 feet 10 inches above the ground while working on 5 in 12 pitch roof was not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238350)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337635619.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.