CINCINNATI, OH —
OSHA Inspection: ARTISTIC DIE MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ARTISTIC DIE MANUFACTURING COMPANY in 2167 FLORENCE AVE., CINCINNATI, OH 45206 (NAICS 323121). OSHA activity number 337640635.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ARTISTIC DIE MANUFACTURING COMPANY
- Site address
- 2167 FLORENCE AVE.
- City
- CINCINNATI
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45206
- Mailing
- 2167 FLORENCE AVE., CINCINNATI, OH 45206
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323121
- Employees
- 16
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Dec 14, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energization, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: (a) The written energy control (lockout) program was inadequate in that it did not address the following items: 1. Who would and how they would deal with outside contractors. 2. The need for periodic or at least annual inspections of the lockout procedures with certification records kept. 3. How the company would enforce compliance with the program. (b) There were no written machine specific energy control (lockout) procedures for equipment with multiple energy sources, such as, but not limited to, the Big Brausse die cutting press. (c) There was no lockout training for authorized and affected/other employees with certification records kept. (d) Procedures for lockout and lockout devices were not provided for employees performing set-up tasks, such as, but not limited, to die board changes on the Big Brausse clam-shell press.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.304 G06 VI
- Issued
- Dec 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $1,190 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(6)(vi): Exposed noncurrent-carrying metal parts of cord- and plug-connected equipment that could have become energized were not grounded: (a) At the inspection area at the end of the Brausse 1050 SEF press, there was portable lamp with a metal shade that was ungrounded as it was powered by a 2 wire cord.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1190
- — Z (S) $1700
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323121)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337640635.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.