Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MASTER PLASTER

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MASTER PLASTER in 15316 HUEBNER RD., SAN ANTONIO, TX 78230 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 337680839.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Master Plaster — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Master Plaster is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MASTER PLASTER
Site address
15316 HUEBNER RD.
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78230
Mailing
3623 W MONYELONGO RD., EDINBURG, TX 78541
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238310
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2013
Abate by
Mar 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):    On or about 12/04/2012, employees were exposed to a fall hazard from an elevation of approximately 13 feet to a concrete surface below while applying stucco to a commercial building on a tubular welded steel scaffold that was missing one of the four planks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2520
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2013
Abate by
Mar 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access:    On or about 12/04/2012, employees were exposed to a fall hazard from an elevation of approximately 13 feet to a concrete surface below while applying stucco to a commercial building on a tubular welded steel scaffold that was missing a means of accessing the upper first and second working surfaces.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2520
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2013
Abate by
Mar 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level:    On or about 12/04/2012, employees were exposed to a fall hazard from an elevation of approximately 13 feet to a concrete surface below while applying stucco to a commercial building on a tubular welded steel scaffold that was missing some form of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2520
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.451 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2013
Abate by
Mar 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects.  For falling objects too large, heavy or massive to be contained or deflected, the employer did not place and secure such potential falling objects away from the edge of the surface from which they could fall:    On or about 12/04/2012, employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard from material and equipment on the upper level of an approximately 13ft high tubular welded steel scaffold while applying stucco to a commercial building.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2520
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2013
Abate by
Apr 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:    On or about 12/04/2012, employees were exposed to a fall hazard from an elevation of approximately 13 feet to a concrete surface below and an overhead struck-by hazard through lack of hazard recognition training while utilizing a tubular welded steel scaffold while applying stucco to a commercial building.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

View Master Plaster's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337680839.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.