RICHWOODS, MO —
OSHA Inspection: RICHWOODS RECYCLING DDE
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RICHWOODS RECYCLING DDE in 10132 COYOTE COVE, RICHWOODS, MO 63071 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 337685812.
What this inspection record means
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Watch Richwoods Recycling DDE — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Richwoods Recycling DDE is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RICHWOODS RECYCLING DDE
- Site address
- 10132 COYOTE COVE
- City
- RICHWOODS
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63071
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 5, RICHWOODS, MO 63071
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423930
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
15 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard: a/ Dated, periodic, inspection reports were not made on the critical items belonging to the Anvil Grapple, m/n H4T-1344. One method to correct this apparent hazard is to prepare and maintain periodic, inspection reports as required by ASME B30.20-2003, paragraph 20-5.3.5. The critical items to be inspected are listed in paragraph 20-5.3.3. of this document. DISCLAIMER: a/ The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b/ The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2000
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard: OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard: a/ Repairs to the hydraulic leak on the critical items belonging to the Anvil Grapple, m/n H4T-1344, were not made. One method to correct this apparent hazard is to prepare and maintain periodic, inspection reports as required by ASME B30.20-2003, paragraph 20-5.3.6. The critical items to be inspected are listed in paragraph 20-5.3.3. of this document. DISCLAIMER: a/ The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b/ The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: A written lockout/tagout program was not developed in writing or implemented for the following machinery: a/ Deere 328 Skid Steer. b/ Koehring 6625 Tracked Material Handler.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including, but not limited to Items of this section: Specific lockout/tagout procedures were not developed in writing for the following machinery: a/ Deere 328 Skid Steer. b/ Koehring 6625 Tracked Material Handler.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C07 IV
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(iv): The employer did not certify that employee training had been accomplished and kept up to date: a/ Employee training in lockout/tagout was not certified.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries: a/ Inside of the office, four, portable, fire extinguishers were not mounted.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $600
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.157 E03
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check: a/ Inside of the office, four, portable, fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check. One portable, fire extinguisher was equipped with a tag reading that the last inspection occurred in 2011.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.157 G02
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter: a/ Inside of the office, exposed employees were not familiarized with the general principles of the portable, fire extinguisher and how to effectively fight an incipient stage fire.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling: a/ Inside of the office, one dual and quad, metallic, receptacle boxes were not secured to a firm surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.305 B02
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2): Each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy: a/ Inside of the office, one dual and quad, metallic, receptacle boxes were uncovered.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employers did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met: a/ A written hazard communication program was not prepared or implemented.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $600
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present, using an identity that was referenced on the appropriate material safety data sheet: a/ A list of hazard materials was not prepared in writing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: a/ Material safety data sheets were not maintained for hazardous materials such as diesel fuel, grease, hydraulic fluid, lubricants, and welding sticks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a/ Exposed employees were not trained in the contents of a written hazard communication program or in the hazardous chemicals in use in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: a/ The workplace hazard assessment identifying what personnel protective equipment was required was not certified.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423930)
Jul 16, 2026
Strong Steel Products, LLC · DETROIT, MI
Jul 15, 2026
Strong Steel Products, LLC · DETROIT, MI
Jul 14, 2026
A09cs000012tehvaaq - Post Metal Recycling · ROCK VALLEY, IA
Jul 10, 2026
Tear a Part Auto Recycling · OGDEN, UT
Jul 9, 2026
161490 - Carolina Metal Recyclers, LLC · GARNER, NC
More inspections in MO
Jul 17, 2026
United Parcel Service · SAINT LOUIS, MO
Jul 15, 2026
Triple J Construction, LLC. · PLATTE CITY, MO
Jul 14, 2026
Torchylo Builders, LLC. · CLINTON, MO
Jul 13, 2026
Jorge Merida · BLUE SPRINGS, MO
Jul 9, 2026
Niagara Bottling · KANSAS CITY, MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337685812.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.