Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TRULITE GLASS AND ALUMINUM SOLUTIONS, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TRULITE GLASS AND ALUMINUM SOLUTIONS, LLC in 5700 S. MOORLAND ROAD, NEW BERLIN, WI 53151 (NAICS 327215). OSHA activity number 337690614.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Trulite Glass and Aluminum Solutions, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Trulite Glass and Aluminum Solutions, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5700 S. MOORLAND ROAD
City
NEW BERLIN
State
WI
ZIP
53151
Mailing
5700 S. MOORLAND ROAD, NEW BERLIN, WI 53151
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327215
Employees
75
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2013
Abate by
Aug 1, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1):     Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:    (a)  The employer did not ensure that employee(s) working at heights of approximately 59 inches were protected from falling to the lower level. Employee(s) were exposed to fall hazards while performing maintenance/servicing on top of the furnace oven.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $1000
  • — C (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.25 B01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2013
Abate by
Feb 1, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.25(b)(1)(i):     All wood parts were not sound and free from accepted visual inspection from shake, wane, compression failures, decay or other irregularities:    (a)  In the tempering area, a job-made wooden ladder was not free of hazards such as but not limited to sharp edges, splinters, and knots. Employee(s) were exposed to fall hazards when using the ladder to access the top of the furnace oven.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1):     The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    (a)  The employer did not develop and implement an energy control program to protect employees performing servicing and/or maintenance activities from the release of hazardous energy. Employees were exposed to struck-by and/or entanglement hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i):     The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees:    (a)  The employer did not ensure all employees performing maintenance, servicing, and/or cleaning activities were trained in the purpose and function of energy control. Employees were cleaning rolls on the Spandrel and were exposed to entanglement hazards due to not having the equipment de-energized at the time.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2013
Abate by
Feb 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i):     The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:    (a)  The employer did not ensure that a periodic inspection of the lockout/tagout procedures was performed at least on an annual basis for employees performing maintenance and/or servicing activities to ensure skills and proficiency were preserved.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 D03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(3):     All energy isolating devices that were needed to control the energy to the machine or equipment were not physically located and operated in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source(s):    (a) On or about 11/19/2012, the employer did not ensure all employees performing cleaning activities on the Spandrel rollers had controlled all hazardous energy prior to placing their hands into a hazardous area. Employees were exposed to entanglement hazards from in-running rollers.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2013
Abate by
Feb 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    (a)  The employer did not ensure all employees operating powered industrial vehicles completed a training program outlined in paragraph (l) prior to driving. Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2013
Abate by
Feb 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii):     An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:    (a)  The employer did not ensure powered industrial vehicle operators were provided a refresher training since 2007 to ensure they are proficient in their skills to operate a forklift in a safe manner. Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.29 B03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(3):     Each recordable injury or illness was not entered on the OSHA 300 Log and on an incident report (OSHA Form 301or equivalent) within seven (7) calendar days of receiving information that a recordable injury or illness had occurred.    (a)  A work-related injury which occurred on or about November 19, 2012 had not been recorded on the OSHA 300 form within 7 calendar days.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 Q07

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2013
Abate by
Feb 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7):     Powered industrial truck(s) which were used on a round-the-clock basis were not examined for defects after each shift:    (a)  The employer did not ensure the Caterpillar forklift was examined before being placed into service each shift.     (b)  The employer did not ensure the Kalmar forklift was examined before being placed into service each shift.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2013
Abate by
Feb 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    (a)  The employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program at the worksite that addresses how material safety data sheets, training, and labeling requirements will be accomplished for employees exposed to hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2013
Abate by
Feb 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     Employers did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area and chemical-specific information was not always available through labels and material safety data sheets.    (a)  The employer did not ensure that information and training was effectively communicated to employees working with chemicals in the workplace, including the location of material safety data sheets.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337690614.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.