Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SANDOVAL PAINTING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SANDOVAL PAINTING in 3020 BUSINESS PARK DR., NORCROSS, GA 30071 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 337728414.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sandoval Painting — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sandoval Painting is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SANDOVAL PAINTING
Site address
3020 BUSINESS PARK DR.
City
NORCROSS
State
GA
ZIP
30071
Mailing
2782 PONTIAC CIRCLE, DORAVILLE, GA 30360
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2013
Abate by
Feb 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system.    On or about December 6, 2012, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 11.5 feet when the employees were working on a low slope roof without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2013
Abate by
Feb 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    On or about December 6, 2012, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 11.5 feet when the employees had not been trained to recognized fall hazards such as, but not limited to, working on a low slope roof without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2013
Abate by
Feb 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:    On or about December 6, 2012, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 11.5 feet when the ladder used to climb onto the roof did not extend three feet above the edge of the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2013
Abate by
Feb 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.    On or about December 6, 2012, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 11.5 feet when the employees had not been trained to recognize ladder hazards such as, but not limited to, using a ladder that  did not extend three feet above the edge of the roof to climb onto the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2013
Abate by
Feb 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    On or about December 6, 2012, employees were exposed to chemical hazards when the employer did not have a hazard communication program.  Employees were exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to, paint and silicone caulk.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2013
Abate by
Feb 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical which they used: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    On or about December 6, 2012, employees were exposed to chemical hazards when the employer did not have a safety data sheet for each chemical in use.  Employees were exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to, paint and silicone caulk.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2013
Abate by
Feb 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    On or about December 6, 2012, employees were exposed to chemical hazards when the employer did not provide employees information and training on the location of the program, location of the MSDS, and training on any hazards associated with chemicals being used.  Employees were exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to, paint and silicone caulk.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.50 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2013
Abate by
Feb 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.50(d)(1): First-aid supplies were not easily accessible when required:    On or about December 6, 2012, employees were exposed to hazards when the employer did not have a first aid kit at the site.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337728414.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.