GUILFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: F. PANZA COMPANY, L.L.C
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of F. PANZA COMPANY, L.L.C in 617 BOSTON POST ROAD, GUILFORD, CT 06437 (NAICS 238190). OSHA activity number 337799027.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- F. PANZA COMPANY, L.L.C
- Site address
- 617 BOSTON POST ROAD
- City
- GUILFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06437
- Mailing
- 275 FOREST ROAD, WEST HAVEN, CT 06516
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238190
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Jobsite: The employees walking and working on the mansard roof soffit section under construction were not protected by any means and exposed to fall hazards of up to 9 feet 1 inch.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: Jobsite: The employee who was working below the workers demolishing a section of the mansard roof was not protected from head injuries by the use of protective helmets.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1120
- — Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238190)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337799027.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.