Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GREAT LAKES STARTALL

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GREAT LAKES STARTALL in 7307 YOUNG DRIVE UNIT G, WALTON HILLS, OH 44146 (NAICS 811111). OSHA activity number 337819817.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Great Lakes Startall — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Great Lakes Startall is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7307 YOUNG DRIVE UNIT G
City
WALTON HILLS
State
OH
ZIP
44146
Mailing
7307 YOUNG DRIVE UNIT G, WALTON HILLS, OH 44146
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811111
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 A08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2013
Abate by
Mar 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(8)  Every floor hole into which persons can accidentally walk were not guarded by either standard railing with standard toeboard on all exposed sides, or by a floor hole cover of standard strength and construction:         On or about December 12, 2012, the open pit that is used to place vehicles over to access under-vehicle systems for fluid changes, etc. was left open with no fall protection in place as required.  The pit is approximately 55 inches deep, 20 feet long, and 37 inches wide.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2013
Abate by
Mar 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):  The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    On or about December 12, 2012, the employer had not conducted an appropriate training and evaluation of the workers permitted to operate the powered industrial vehicle(s) in use within the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2013
Abate by
Mar 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The guard for abrasive wheel machinery where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel:    On or about December 12, 2012, the Amrox bench grinder, left wheel, in use in the repair area had no tongue guard in place to maintain the one-fourth inch minimum opening.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2013
Abate by
Mar 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer had not developed, implemented, or maintained a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section will be met:    On or about December 12, 2012, the employer had not compiled and made available to the workers a written hazard communication program for such hazardous materials/chemicals as, but not limited to the motor oils, solvents, diesel fuel, etc. in use on site.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 H

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2013
Abate by
Mar 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h):  Employees were not provided information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and (2) on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area:    On or about December 12, 2012, the employer had not provided training for such hazardous materials/chemicals as, but not limited to the motor oils, solvents, diesel fuel, etc. in use on site.      Elements of a Hazard Communication information and training program are:    Information to employees shall include:    1)  Any operations in their work area where hazardous chemicals are present.    2)  The location and availability of the written hazard communication program, including the required list(s) of hazardous chemicals, and material safety data sheets.    Training for employees shall include:    3)  Methods and observations that may be used to detect the presence or release of a hazardous chemical in the work area (such as monitoring conducted by the employer, continuous monitoring devices, visual appearance or odor of hazardous chemicals when being released, etc.)    4)  The physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area,    5)  The measures employees can take to protect themselves from these hazards, including specific procedures the employer has implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures, and personal protective equipment to  be used.    6)  The details of  the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labeling system and the material safety data sheet, and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2013
Abate by
Mar 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):  The required workplace hazard assessment was not certified as being performed, identifying the person completing the assessment, and written certification of the date of the assessment:    On or about December 12, 2012 the workplace assessment, designed to identify personal protective equipment (PPE) needed by employees to prevent injury, was not performed.    NOTE:  The assessment shall be written, titled, dated and certified by signature.  The required documented training shall include the following:    1)	When PPE is necessary;  2)	What PPE is necessary;  3)	Limitations of the PPE;  4)	How to properly wear and use the PPE, and  5)	Inspection and care of the PPE
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337819817.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.