Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ROSCO MANUFACTURING LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ROSCO MANUFACTURING LLC in 175 DUPONT DR, PROVIDENCE, RI 02907 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 337822423.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rosco Manufacturing LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rosco Manufacturing LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
175 DUPONT DR
City
PROVIDENCE
State
RI
ZIP
02907
Mailing
175 DUPONT DRIVE, PROVIDENCE, RI 02907
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
38
Ownership type
A

14 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2013
Abate by
Jul 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,190 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(d)(1): Flights of stairs having four or more risers were not equipped with a standard railing as specified in paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (v) of this section:    Workplace:  On or about December 13, 2012 the exterior stairs for the north side exit on the loading dock had five risers and was not provided with standard stair railings.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1190
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.38 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 38 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2013
Abate by
Aug 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,190 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.38(b): An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review:    Workplace:  On or about December 19, 2012 the employer had not established a written emergency action plan.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1190
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 38 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2013
Abate by
Jul 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,570 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):    Workplace:  On or about December 19, 2012  the employer had not certified that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed.  Employees are exposed to foot, hand, arm, upper body and face hazards from corrosive chemicals , heavy objects,  sharp edges and metal fragments .     Abatement Note:   Once the PPE Hazard Assessment is completed you shall:  1) Certify that the hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification in accordance with 1910.132 (d) (2),   2) Provide training to affected employees in proper use of required PPE (1910.132 (f) (1)), and   3) Verify that the training of each affected employee has been completed and documented through a written certification in accordance with 1910.132 (d) (4).    Guidance on conducting and documenting a PPE Hazard Assessment can be found on OSHA's website at:  http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/personalprotectiveequipment
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $3570

1910.132 F01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 38 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2013
Abate by
Jul 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment:  Workplace: On or about December 19, 2012 the employer had not ensured that employees were trained in proper use of PPE.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2013
Abate by
Jun 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,487 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    Workplace: On or about December 13, 2012 the employer had not ensured that employees using corrosive chemicals, including Flexiclean, were provided with adequate eye and facial protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1487
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2013
Abate by
Jul 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  Workplace: On or about December 13, 2012 the employer had not ensured that employees using corrosive chemicals including Flexiclean were provided with suitable facilities for the flushing of the eyes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 38 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,190 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment:    Workplace: On or about December 13, 2012 the employer had not ensured that the electrical switching panels on the north and south walls of the Rosco production area had sufficient access and working space provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1190
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.1200 E01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 38 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2013
Abate by
Aug 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present, using an identity that was referenced on the appropriate material safety data sheet:    Workplace:  On or about December 19, 2012 the employer's Hazard Communication Program did not include a listing of the hazardous chemicals used in this workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.1200 F05 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 38 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2013
Abate by
Jun 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:  Workplace:  On or about December 13, 2012 the employer did not ensure that containers of hazardous materials, including spray bottles of Stone Cleaner and a bucket of diluted Flexiclean, were labeled with appropriate hazard warnings.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 38 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2013
Abate by
Jul 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift:  Workplace:  On or about December 19, 2012 the employer did not maintain copies of the material safety data sheets in an area accessible to employees on the second and third shifts.   MSDS were maintained in the Safety and Health Manager's Office.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 38 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2013
Abate by
Jul 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Workplace:  On or about December 19, 2012 the employer had not trained employees when they were initially hired on the hazardous chemicals that they use in their workplaces.  Employees work with several hazardous chemicals including Castrol's Flexiclean and Rustilio DWX 30.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.37 A03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 38 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2013
Abate by
Jun 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $595 · Current $298 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:    Workplace: On or about December 19, 2012 the emergency exit door landing on the north side of the loading dock area was partially obstructed by a parked truck.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $298
  • — Z (O) $595

1910.95 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 38 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2013
Abate by
Aug 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:   Workplace:  On or about December 13, 2012 the employer had implemented a hearing conservation program based on incomplete test data in that the monitoring was less than 3 hours.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2013
Abate by
Aug 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  Workplace: On or about December 13, 2012 the employer had not conducted air quality monitoring in the production area to determine if employees were exposed to respiratory hazards.  Employees regularly work with metal working fluids and corrosion inhibitors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Rosco Manufacturing LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337822423.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.