CEREDO, WV —
OSHA Inspection: ANR PARTNERS
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ANR PARTNERS in 626 MAIN STREET, CEREDO, WV 25507 (NAICS 326299). OSHA activity number 337824411.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ANR PARTNERS
- Site address
- 626 MAIN STREET
- City
- CEREDO
- State
- WV
- ZIP
- 25507
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 877, CEREDO, WV 25507
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 326299
- Employees
- 46
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: (b) Bun Department: An employee that was using an adhesive liquid to join sheets of rubber together was not wearing protective eyewear that was required by the material safety data sheet as determined on December 13, 2012. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1260
- — C (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): (a) Bun Department: A personal protective equipment assesment had not been conducted for all work operations that posed a potential eye hazard including, but not limited to, employees operating various saws on site to cut sheets of rubber and using an adhesive liquid to join sheets of rubber together as determined on December 13, 2012. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes: (a) Bun Department: Employees were using Slocum Adhesives Corporation V-4055 Adhesive to connect sheets of rubber together and they were not wearing impermeable gloves as required by the manufacturer's material safety data sheet as determined on December 13, 2012. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1260
- — C (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) Bun Department: Employees that work with hazardous chemicals including, but not limited to, Slocum Adhesives V-4055 Adhesive, were not provided training on the physical and health hazards associated with these chemicals as determined on December 13, 2012. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1260
- — C (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: (a) Bun Department - #1 Stripper Machine: A guard was not provided for this machine to prevent the employee from coming into contact with the twenty converging blades that slice rubber sheets into thin strips as observed on January 31, 2013. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2520
- — C (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $4200
1910.157 G02
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter: (a) Employees had not received training on the use of ABC portable fire extinguishers on site upon first being hired as determined on December 13, 2012. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326299)
More inspections in WV
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337824411.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.