STONY BROOK, NY —
OSHA Inspection: VALENTE CONTRACTING CORP.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of VALENTE CONTRACTING CORP. in MARBURGER DRIVE, STONY BROOK, NY 11794 (NAICS 238110). OSHA activity number 337865034.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VALENTE CONTRACTING CORP.
- Site address
- MARBURGER DRIVE
- City
- STONY BROOK
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 11794
- Mailing
- 77 JACKSON AVENUE, MINEOLA, NY 11501
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238110
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,080 · Current $594 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets. (a) Marburger Drive, Stony Brook, NY (Worksite), Trench - Employees pouring concrete into the electrical transmission feeder forms were working near and directly below the chute of the concrete truck without protective helmets, on or about December 13, 2012. Note: Because the abatement for this violation has already been documented the employer need not submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $594
- — Z (S) $1080
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,440 · Current $792 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. (a) Worksite, Trench - Employees pouring and finishing the concrete in the electrical transmission feeder forms were not provided with eye protection, on or about December 13, 2012. Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $792
- — Z (S) $1440
1926.651 C02
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,540 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(c)(2): A stairway, ladder, ramp or other safe means of egress was not located in trench excavations that were 4 feet (1.22m) or more in depth so as to require no more than 25 feet (7.62m) of lateral travel for employees: (a) Stony Brook University, Marburger Drive (Worksite), Electrical Feeder Trench - The employees pouring and finishing the concrete duct bank along the bottom of the unprotected trench, approximately 450' L x 7' W x 6' D, were not provided with a means of egress, on or about December 13, 2012. NOTE: In addition to abatement certifcation, the employer is required to submit abatement documentation for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1540
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.651 J02
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,540 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(j)(2): Protection was not provided by placing and keeping excavated or other materials or equipment at least 2 feet (.61m) from the edge of excavations, or by the use of retaining devices that were sufficient to prevent materials or equipment from falling or rolling into excavations, or by a combination of both if necessary. (a) Worksite, Electrical Feeder Trench - Employees were pouring concrete into the electrical feeder duct bank forms in an unprotected trench, measuring approximately 450' L x 7' W x 6' D. Excavated material surcharges (spoil piles) were placed directly on the edges of the trench, exposing the employees to struck by and cave in hazards. The unsupported sides of the trench were not protected by sloping, benching, supporting, or shielding, on or about December 13, 2012. NOTE: In addition to abatement certification, the employer is required to submit abatement documentation for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1540
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.651 K01
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): An inspection of the excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems was not conducted by the competent person prior to the start of work and as needed throughout the shift: (a) Worksite, Electrical Feeder Trench - A competent person did not inspect the trench before employees accessed it and started the electrical feeder duct bank concrete pour, on or about December 13, 2012. NOTE: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1100
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.652 A01
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,540 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with paragraph (b) or (c) of this section: (a) Worksite, Electrical Feeder Trench - The employees pouring and finishing the concrete duct bank along the bottom of the unprotected trench, approximately 450' L x 7' W x 6' D, were not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system, on or about December 13, 2012. NOTE: In addition to abatement certification, the employer is required to submit abatement documentation for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1540
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections at Valente Contracting Corp.
View Valente Contracting Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238110)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337865034.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.