PHILADELPHIA, PA —
OSHA Inspection: ULIHO II INC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ULIHO II INC in 810 HUNTINGDON STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19133 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 337895213.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ULIHO II INC
- Site address
- 810 HUNTINGDON STREET
- City
- PHILADELPHIA
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 19133
- Mailing
- 1217 S. 23RD ST. 1ST FL., PHILADELPHIA, PA 19146
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
- Migrant workforce
- X
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Apr 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. a) Jobsite: 810 Huntingdon Street - Two employees performing stucco work from a fabricated frame scaffold, approximately 13 feet above lower level were not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraphs (g)(4) of this section. Observed on or about 10/23/12.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Apr 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. a) Jobsite: 810 Huntingdon Street - Fabricated frame scaffolds were not altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration. A competent person was not available at the worksite when the employees moved planks between working platforms. Noted on 10/23/12.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.95 A
- Issued
- Apr 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.95(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided: a) Jobsite: 810 Huntingdon Street - Protective equipment for hands was not provided to three employees who were exposed to illnesses such as dermititis by handling stucco and colored cement while applying stucco to the outside wall of a residence. Observed on or about 10/23/12.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1120
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 17, 2013
- Abate by
- May 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59) a) Jobsite: 810 Huntingdon Street - The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program for employees who handled Mediterranean Stucco and cement colors as required by this section. Observed on or about 10/23/12.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 F06
- Issued
- Apr 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(6): Scaffolds were erected, used, dismantled, altered, or moved such that they, or any conductive material handled on them, could have come closer than the minimum distances established for specific voltages as set forth in the table in subparagraph (f)(6).Note: Specify distances as indicated in table in paragraph (f)(6) of this section. a) Jobsite: 810 Huntingdon Street - The employees were exposed to electrical hazards when they worked from the scaffold erected approximately within three feet of unguarded power lines. Noted on 10/23/12.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337895213.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.