SCHAUMBURG, IL —
OSHA Inspection: COLETTE M. DAILY ELECTRICAL INC.
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of COLETTE M. DAILY ELECTRICAL INC. in 1015 STATE PARKWAY, SCHAUMBURG, IL 60173 (NAICS 238210). OSHA activity number 337900211.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- COLETTE M. DAILY ELECTRICAL INC.
- Site address
- 1015 STATE PARKWAY
- City
- SCHAUMBURG
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60173
- Mailing
- 702 SOUTH VERMONT STREET, PALATINE, IL 60173
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238210
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.333 A01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,425 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(a)(1): Live parts to which an employee could be exposed were not deenergized before the employee worked on or near them: a) Technician employee did not deenergize before working on or near live electrical parts such as the electrical panel where an arc flash took place.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1425
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.333 A02
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(a)(2): Where exposed live parts were not de-energized, other safety-related work practices were not used to protect employees who could be exposed to the electrical hazards involved: a) Technician working on or near live electrical parts did not use safety related work practices.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with, and did not use, electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed: a) Technical employee working on or near live electrical parts such as the 480 volt electrical panel, did not use electrical protective equipment such as volt rated gloves, and fire retardant clothing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.335 A01 V
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(v): Employees exposed to the danger of injury to the eyes or face from electric arcs or flashes or from flying objects resulting from electrical explosion did not wear protective equipment for the eyes or face: a) Technical employees working on or near live electrical parts such as the 480 electrical panel, did not use eyes or face protection. Employees were exposed to the danger of injury to the eyes or face from electric arcs, flashes and from objects.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.335 A01 IV
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(iv): Employees exposed to the danger head injury from electric shock or burns due to contact with exposed energized parts did not wear nonconductive head protection: a) Technical employee working on or near live electrical parts such as the 480 volt electrical panel, did not use nonconductive head protection. Employees were exposed to the danger of head injury and burns.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.335 A02 I
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(2)(i): When working near exposed energized conductors or circuit parts, each employee did not use insulated tools or handling equipment when the tools or handling equipment might have made contact with such conductors or parts: a) The employe did not ensure that the technician employee used insulated tools or handling equipment when the tools or equipment might come into contact with energized conductors or parts such as the electrical panel.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238210)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337900211.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.