LAUDERDALE BY THE SEA, FL —
OSHA Inspection: UP NORTH ROOFING & REMODELING, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of UP NORTH ROOFING & REMODELING, INC. in 4417 EL MAR DRIVE, LAUDERDALE BY THE SEA, FL 33308 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 337904817.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- UP NORTH ROOFING & REMODELING, INC.
- Site address
- 4417 EL MAR DRIVE
- City
- LAUDERDALE BY THE SEA
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33308
- Mailing
- 10532 157TH STREET N., JUPITER, FL 33478
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- May 10, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a. On or about December 17, 2012, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was installing roofing material with a pneumatic nail gun without wearing protective eyewear or face protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- May 10, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a safety monitoring system alone: a. On or about December 17, 2012, at the above addressed jobsite, seven employees were observed walking and working on a low-slope roof without the use of conventional fall protection or without a warning line system and safety monitoring system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337904817.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.