MENOMONEE FALLS, WI —
OSHA Inspection: BURTON & MAYER, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BURTON & MAYER, INC. in W140 N9000 LILLY ROAD, MENOMONEE FALLS, WI 53051 (NAICS 323110). OSHA activity number 337909618.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BURTON & MAYER, INC.
- Site address
- W140 N9000 LILLY ROAD
- City
- MENOMONEE FALLS
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53051
- Mailing
- W140 N9000 LILLY ROAD, MENOMONEE FALLS, WI 53051
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323110
- Employees
- 83
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.146 C01
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,666 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(1): The employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces were permit-required confined spaces: (a) In the printing press department, the employer did not evaluate the pits beneath the Komori presses to determine if any were considered permit-required confined spaces. Employees were exposed to entanglement hazards when entering the pits for maintenance and/or minor servicing activities, such as moving rails.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1666
- — Z (S) $2380
1910.147 D
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,666 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6): (a) In the printing press area, the employer did not ensure that employees who entered the pits below the Komori presses and were out of view from other employees in the area were protected by the use of energy control or equally effective mechanisms which does not include an emergency stop device. Employees were exposed to struck-by and/or entanglement hazards when entering the pits.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1666
- — Z (S) $2380
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees: (a) In the printing press area, the employer did not ensure that training was provided to ito authorized employees to include the purpose and function of energy control for duties such as but not limited to entering the pits below the Komori presses to move rails or retrieve tools. Employees were exposed to struck-by and/or entanglement hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,666 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o). (a) In the letter press area, the employer did not ensure the inclined belt for the Craftsman Align A Rip table saw was fully guarded. Employees were exposed to entanglement hazards when operating the saw.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1666
- — Z (S) $2380
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years: (a) The employer did not ensure all powered industrial vehicle drivers who had been previously trained had undergone a performance evaluation at least once every three years.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.304 G05
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective: (a) In the bindery department, the employer did not ensure the plug for the CL Finishing Batch Counter had a grounding pin.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Burton & Mayer, INC.
View Burton & Mayer, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323110)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337909618.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.