YORKVILLE, IL —
OSHA Inspection: G. H. HAWS & ASSOCIATES
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of G. H. HAWS & ASSOCIATES in 207 BEAVER STREET, YORKVILLE, IL 60560 (NAICS 333511). OSHA activity number 337910616.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- G. H. HAWS & ASSOCIATES
- Site address
- 207 BEAVER STREET
- City
- YORKVILLE
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60560
- Mailing
- 207 BEAVER STREET, YORKVILLE, IL 60560
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333511
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- May 10, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminants chemical state and physical form: The employer did not evaluate the respiratory hazards in the fiberglass area. Employees were required to use chemicals such but not limited to fiberglass, acetone, Maxthane 101-A, Maxthane101-B, AROPOL, Methyl ethyl ketone peroxide. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $720
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- May 10, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: The employer failed to develop and implement a Respiratory Protection Program prior to requiring employees to wear an air purifying respirator in the fiberglass area. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- May 10, 2013
- Abate by
- May 10, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years: The employer authorized production employees to operate the powered industrial trucks failing to evaluate truck operators performance at least once every three years. Abatement documentation is not required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $720
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- May 10, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: On or about March 20, 2012 the employer failed to follow machine guarding requirements and protect employees against flying parts, debris and entanglement hazards. Employees were exposed to these hazards while using machines: a) Motion-Master (MN 8520-6.225) b) Motion-Master (MN 8520-6.2RNI) Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- May 10, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Employees were exposed to chemicals such as but not limited to fiberglass, acetone, Maxthane 101-A, Maxthane101-B, AROPOL, Methyl ethyl ketone proxide. The employer did not develop, implement and maintain a site-specific written hazard communication program. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at G. H. Haws & Associates
View G. H. Haws & Associates's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333511)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337910616.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.