Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DIAMOND ONIONS, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of DIAMOND ONIONS, INC. in 4924 WOODALL STREET, DALLAS, TX 75247 (NAICS 424480). OSHA activity number 337915813.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Diamond Onions, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Diamond Onions, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4924 WOODALL STREET
City
DALLAS
State
TX
ZIP
75247
Mailing
4924 WOODALL STREET, DALLAS, TX 75247
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424480
Employees
95
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 B01

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Apr 16, 2013
Abate by
May 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1): When employees were subjected to sound exceeding those listed in Table G-16, feasible administrative or engineering controls were not utilized:    This violation occurred on December 27, 2012, when the employer had not utilized administrative or engineering controls for employees exposed to noise that exceeded an 8-hour TWA of 90 dBA, based on a 90 dB threshold:    a) In the peeling department, a trim line operator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 893% of the permissible 8-hour TWA.  The equivalent level of 893% is approximately 105.8 dBA.  Sampling was performed for 474 minutes during one shift.  Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 6 minutes.    b) In the peeling department, a trim line operator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 862% of the permissible 8-hour TWA.  The equivalent level of 862% is approximately 105.5 dBA.  Sampling was performed for 453 minutes during one shift.  Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 27 minutes.    c) In the peeling department, a trim line operator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 929% of the permissible 8-hour TWA.  The equivalent level of 929% is approximately 106.1 dBA.  Sampling was performed for 479 minutes during one shift.  Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 1 minute.    d) In the peeling department, a trim line operator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 711% of the permissible 8-hour TWA.  The equivalent level of 711% is approximately 104.1 dBA.  Sampling was performed for 480 minutes during one shift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 10 8 instances 40 exposed
Issued
Apr 16, 2013
Abate by
May 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equaled or exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:    This violation occurred on December 27, 2012, when the employer had not administered a hearing conservation program for employees exposed to noise that exceeded an 8-hour TWA of 85 dBA, based on an 80 dB threshold:    a) In the peeling department, a trim line operator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 894% of the permissible 8-hour TWA.  The equivalent level of 894% is approximately 105.8 dBA.  Sampling was performed for 474 minutes during one shift.  Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 6 minutes.    b) In the peeling department, a trim line operator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 863% of the permissible 8-hour TWA.  The equivalent level of 863% is approximately 105.5 dBA.  Sampling was performed for 453 minutes during one shift.  Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 27 minutes.    c) In the peeling department, a trim line operator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 930% of the permissible 8-hour TWA.  The equivalent level of 930% is approximately 106.1 dBA.  Sampling was performed for 479 minutes during one shift.  Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 1 minute.    d) In the peeling department, a trim line operator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 712% of the permissible 8-hour TWA.  The equivalent level of 712% is approximately 104.2 dBA.  Sampling was performed for 480 minutes during one shift.      e) In the peeling department, an orienter was exposed to continuous noise levels at 320% of the permissible 8-hour TWA.  The equivalent level of 320% is approximately 98.4 dBA.  Sampling was performed for 480 minutes during one shift.      f) In the peeling department, an orienter was exposed to continuous noise levels at 358% of the permissible 8-hour TWA.  The equivalent level of 358% is approximately 99.2 dBA.  Sampling was performed for 480 minutes during one shift.      g) In the trash department, a press operator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 79.5% of the permissible 8-hour TWA.  The equivalent level of 79.5% is approximately 88.3 dBA.  Sampling was performed for 480 minutes during one shift.      h) In the packout department, a scale operator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 68.0% of the permissible 8-hour TWA.  The equivalent level of 68.0% is approximately 87.2 dBA.  Sampling was performed for 473 minutes during one shift.  Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 7 minutes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $4900

View Diamond Onions, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337915813.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.