DULUTH, GA —
OSHA Inspection: AIRFLOTEK, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AIRFLOTEK, INC. in 2150 NORTHMONT PKWY, STE H, DULUTH, GA 30096 (NAICS 333411). OSHA activity number 337918213.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AIRFLOTEK, INC.
- Site address
- 2150 NORTHMONT PKWY, STE H
- City
- DULUTH
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30096
- Mailing
- P.O.BOX 2739, DULUTH, GA 30096
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333411
- Employees
- 13
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2013
- Abate by
- May 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards: On or about December 18, 2012, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately nine feet when the opening used to place materials on the mezzanine did not have guardrails.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2013
- Abate by
- May 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one-eighth inch: On or about December 18, 2012, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when the work rest on the grinder was approximately 1/2 inch from the periphery of the grinding wheel.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2013
- Abate by
- May 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one-fourth inch: On or about December 18, 2012, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when the grinder was missing a tongue guard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.303 G01 I A
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2013
- Abate by
- May 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(i)(A): For electric equipment operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, and likely to require examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while energized, the depth of the working space in the direction of access to live parts (as measured from the live parts where they were exposed or from the enclosure front or opening whwere they were enclosed) was less than indicated in Table S-1 of Subpart S of Part 1910: On or about December 18, 2012, employees were exposed to struck-by and chemical hazards when the electrical panels were blocked with equipment and materials. a. area in front of the electrical panels near the Instapak system b. electrical panels in the saw area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.37 B06
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(6): Each exit sign was not illuminated to a surface value of at least five foot-candles (54 lux) by a reliable light source and be distinctive in color: On or about December 18, 2012, employees were exposed hazards when the lights in the exit signs were not working.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.157 E02
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2013
- Abate by
- May 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly: On or about December 18, 2012, employees were exposed to fire hazards when the fire extinguishers had not been checked on a monthly basis to insure that they were not discharged and to insure that annual inspections had not been missed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.157 E03
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check: On or about December 18, 2012, employees were exposed to fire hazards when the fire extinguishers had not been checked since 2010.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Airflotek, INC.
View Airflotek, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333411)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337918213.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.