Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MIDWEST INSERT & COMPOSITE MOLDING, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MIDWEST INSERT & COMPOSITE MOLDING, INC. in 3940 INDUSTRIAL AVENUE, ROLLING MEADOWS, IL 60008 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 337937619.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Midwest Insert & Composite Molding, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Midwest Insert & Composite Molding, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3940 INDUSTRIAL AVENUE
City
ROLLING MEADOWS
State
IL
ZIP
60008
Mailing
3940 INDUSTRIAL AVENUE, ROLLING MEADOWS, IL 60008
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 14, 2013
Abate by
Feb 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,060 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1):  The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury.    a) Facility Wide - The employer did not establish a lockout tagout program that included an energy control procedure for employees to follow, training and periodic inspections to ensure that employees performing maintenance were protected from injuries caused by the unexpected startup of vertical and horizontal injection molding machines.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1060
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 14, 2013
Abate by
Feb 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,104 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii):  Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    a) Production Area - The employer did not ensure that the point of operation on machinery was guarded to prevent employees from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during the operating cycle on equipment such as the Niigata #8 Injection Molding Machine, SN #80207A      b) Production Area - The employer did not ensure that the point of operation on machinery was guarded to   prevent employees from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during the operating cycle on equipment such as the Newbury Injection Molder #1, SN# 10882380S93    c) Production Area - The employer did not ensure that the point of operation on machinery was guarded to prevent employees from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during the operating cycle on equipment such as the Newbury Injection Molder # 2 SN# 10882380S94.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1104
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 14, 2013
Abate by
Jan 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $636 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b):  Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.    a) Production Area - Compressed air used for cleaning purposes on equipment, such as the Newbury #2, and Newbury   #3 injection molding machines was not reduced to less than 30 PSI.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $636
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.157 E03

Other-than-serious 5 instances 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 14, 2013
Abate by
Feb 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check.    a) Facility Wide - The employer did not ensure that maintenance checks on equipment, such as fire extinguishers were performed on an annual basis.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337937619.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.