FOND DU LAC, WI —
OSHA Inspection: DANTE'S REMODELING LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DANTE'S REMODELING LLC in MAIN AND MERRILL, FOND DU LAC, WI 54935 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 337943419.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DANTE'S REMODELING LLC
- Site address
- MAIN AND MERRILL
- City
- FOND DU LAC
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54935
- Mailing
- 2613 W. MICHIGAN AVE #2, MILWAUKEE, WI 53233
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Employees reroofing a commercial building were not wearing or provided with safety glasses.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toe boards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: Employees reroofing a commercial building were not protected from falling by any form of fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: The employees reroofing a commercial building did not recognize the need for fall protection and were not able to identify methods of using or installing fall protection systems.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B03
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(3): Ladders were loaded beyond their manufacturer's rated capacity: Two employees were climbing a Class II aluminum ladder with a duty rating of 225# at the same time. One employee was deliberately bouncing the ladder while his co-worker was climbing as well .
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B09
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(9): The area around the top and bottom of ladders was not kept clear: The aluminum extension ladder used to access the roof was positioned where the employees had to step off of the ladder and walk along the rounded clay tile parapet cap in order to move past an air conditioning unit and access the roof surface.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B22
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall: Four different employees each carried tools up the ladder and two employees had equipment in both hands while climbing.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1060 A01
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders as necessary, enabling each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards: The employees were not trained to recognize the hazards associated with misusing ladders or the proper use of ladders.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Dante'S Remodeling LLC
View Dante'S Remodeling LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337943419.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.