HERKIMER, NY —
OSHA Inspection: ELG UTICA ALLOYS, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ELG UTICA ALLOYS, INC. in 378 GROS BLVD., SUITE 3, HERKIMER, NY 13350 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 337949010.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ELG UTICA ALLOYS, INC.
- Site address
- 378 GROS BLVD., SUITE 3
- City
- HERKIMER
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13350
- Mailing
- 378 GROS BLVD., SUITE 3, HERKIMER, NY 13350
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423930
- Employees
- 45
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 13, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $2,520 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): A continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (n) was not instituted when employee noise exposures equaled or exceeded an 8 hour time-weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 dBA: a) Torching Area, on or about 12/21/12: An employee working as a Torcher was exposed to continuous noise at a level of 146.4% of the dose of the OSHA permissible exposure limit. The equivalent dBA for the 146.4% dose is approximatey 92.8 dBA calculated as the 8 hour time weighted sound pressure level. The sampling was conducted on 12/21/12 for 411 minutes. Exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 69 minutes not sampled. Employee was wearing ear plugs. Abatement methodology: Step 1: An effective hearing conservation program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (n) shall be maintained. An effective hearing conservation program shall include, at a minimum: (1) a baseline audiogram for all employees exposed to noise levels equal to or in excess of the standard. (2) Annual audiograms for each overexposed employee (3) analysis of audiogram results with retesting and/or referral to an otolaryngologist or qualified physician when a significant threshold shift occurs. A significant shift will be considered to be equal to or greater than an average of 30 dba over the 2000, 3000, and 4000 hertz frequencies. (4) Where insert ear plugs or custom-molded devices are utilized, individual employee fitting shall be conducted by a trained person, and employees shall be instructed in the care and use of the devices.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2520
- — Z (S) $3600
1910.95 L01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(l)(1): A copy of 29 CFR 1910.95 was not made available to affected employees or their representatives nor was a copy posted in the workplace: a) Torching Area, on or about 12/21/12: The employer did not provide a copy of 1910.95 to the affected employees, or post a copy in the workplace, when employees were exposed to noise that exceeded the 8-hour time weighted average.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.101 B
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $2,520 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.101(b): Section 3.4.4, Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, as adopted by 29 CFR 1910.101(b): Compressed gas cylinder(s) in use were not properly supported to prevent them from being knocked over and 29 CFR 1910.101(b): Section 3.5.3 , Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, as adopted by 29 CFR 1910.101(b): Compressed gas cylinders containing flammable gases were stored within 20 feet of cylinders containing oxygen: a) Utica Plant, Crusher 1 Storage Area, on or about 12/12/12: A total of eleven compresssed gas cylinders: Acetylene, Oxygen and Argon 4 Mix were not secured to prevent them from being knocked over. b) Utica Plant, Crusher 1 Storage Area, on or about 12/12/12: Compressed gas cylinders: Four Acetylene and Two Oxygen were stored with each other.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2520
- — Z (S) $3600
1910.151 B
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $3,150 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(b): Adequate first aid supplies were not readily available: a) Laboratory Area on or about 12/11/12: Employees work with Hydrofloric Acid and Calcium Gluconate Gel was not on site in the first aid supply kit for use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3150
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: a) Crusher Room, on or about 12/11/12: No eyewash was provided for employees who worked with including but not limited to: ISM Degreaser containing chemicals including but not limited to: potassium hydroxide.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.157 G02
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,890 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter: a) Throughout the facility, on or about 12/21/12: Training was not provided to employees on the use of fire extinguishers and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting. * ABATEMENT NOTE: By this date the employer must either correct the alleged violation or implement a Fire Safety Policy; as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and .39 which includes the evacuation requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157(b).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1890
- — Z (S) $2700
More inspections at ELG Utica Alloys, INC.
View ELG Utica Alloys, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423930)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337949010.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.