Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RIOS GUADALUPE PEREZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RIOS GUADALUPE PEREZ in 8629 PERRIN BEITEL, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78217 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 337955611.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rios Guadalupe Perez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rios Guadalupe Perez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
8629 PERRIN BEITEL
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78217
Mailing
105 CARLOTA, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78228
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Dec 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $1,360
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    On or about 12/18/12 employees were exposed to being struck by masonry stone, from a scaffold 13 ft. in height that had masonry stone piled on it with no way to prevent the stone from falling over the side, while installing masonry brick on a column.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1360

1926.451 H02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Dec 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below:    On or about 12/18/12 employees were exposed to being struck by masonry stone, from a scaffold 13 ft. in height that had masonry stone piled on it with no way to prevent the stone from falling over the side, while installing masonry brick on a column.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $1,360
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):    On or about 12/18/12 employees were exposed to a fall of approximately 13 ft. in height to the unpaved ground level below, from a scaffold that had only 4 out of approximately 7 planking installed on the top level, while installing masonry stone on a column.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1360

1926.451 C02 II

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $1,360
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(ii): Unstable objects were used to support scaffolds or platform units:    On or about 12/18/12 employees were exposed to a fall of approximately 13 ft. in height to the ground level below, from a scaffold that had 4 of 8 end poles resting on stone planks stacked on top of bricks, while installing masonry stone on a column.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1360

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $1,360
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Cross braces were used as a means of access:     On or about 12/18/12 employees were exposed to a fall of approximately 13 ft. in height to the ground level below, while accessing a scaffold to install masonry stone on a column.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1360

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $1,360
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:    On or about 12/18/12 employees were exposed to a fall of approximately 13 ft. in height to the ground level below, from a scaffold that did not have top rails or mid rails, while installing masonry stone.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1360

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $1,360
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:    On or about 12/18/12 employees were exposed to a fall of approximately 13 ft. in height to the ground level below, from a scaffold that: had 4 of its 8 end poles resting on stone planks and bricks, did not have railing above 10 ft., did not have a safe means of access, and was not fully planked.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1360

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person:    On or about 12/18/12 employees were exposed to a fall of approximately 13 ft. in height to the ground level below, from a scaffold that: had 4 of its 8 end poles resting on stone planks and bricks, did not have railing above 10 ft, did not have a safe means of access, and was not fully planked.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337955611.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.