WOOSTER, OH —
OSHA Inspection: SMITHVILLE MANUFACTURING TOOLING AND STAMPING
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SMITHVILLE MANUFACTURING TOOLING AND STAMPING in 6563 CLEVELAND RD., WOOSTER, OH 44691 (NAICS 332116). OSHA activity number 337958425.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SMITHVILLE MANUFACTURING TOOLING AND STAMPING
- Site address
- 6563 CLEVELAND RD.
- City
- WOOSTER
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44691
- Mailing
- 6563 CLEVELAND RD., WOOSTER, OH 44691
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332116
- Employees
- 21
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Mar 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about December 19, 2012, the company did not implement and maintain a written hazard communication program at the site. Employees work with hazardous materials such as, but not limited to propane, acetylene, mineral spirits, stoddard solvents, and WD-40.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.1200 F06 I
- Issued
- Mar 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(i): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information required by 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(i) through 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(v): On or about December 19, 2012, the employer did not ensure that containers were labeled with the identity of the chemical. Unlabeled containers were located in the vibration room that contained WD-40 and Stoddard Solvent.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Mar 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about December 19, 2012, the employer did not provide training or information to employees working with hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to propane, acetylene, mineral spirits, stoddard solvents, and WD-40.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Mar 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not ensure that a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures was established and implemented to include the provisions of (i)-(ix), as applicable: On or about December 19, 2012, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program for employees including, but not limited to, those who are required to wear half-face tight fitting respirators when mixing chemicals in the vibration room.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Mar 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On or about December 19, 2012, the employees required to use half-face tight-fitting respirators, including but not limited to mixers in the vibration room, had not received medical evaluations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Mar 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): On or about December 19, 2012, employees required to use half-face tight-fitting respirators had not received a fit test.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 K03
- Issued
- Mar 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace: On or about December 19, 2012, employees required to use half-face tight-fitting respirators including, but not limited to the mixers in the vibration room did not have respirator training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.151 B
- Issued
- Mar 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(b): There was neither an infirmary, clinic, or hospital used for the treatment of all injured employees in near proximity to the workplace nor a person or persons adequately trained to render first aid: On or about December 19, 2012, the employer did not have an adequately trained personal to provide first aid to employees injuried. Also, it would take fire, ems and police more then 5 minutes to respond to an emergency if an employee was injuried.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1030 G02 II B
- Issued
- Mar 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(ii)(B): The employer did not ensure that the training was provided to employees with occupational exposure at least annually: On or about Decemeber 19, 2012, the employer did not provide Bloodborne Pathogens training on an annual basis to employees designated as first aid responders.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1030 C01 I
- Issued
- Mar 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure: On or about December 19, 2012, the employer did not establish an Exposure Control Plan to eliminate or minmize employee exposures during responses to incidents where first aid is administered.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Smithville Manufacturing Tooling and Stamping
View Smithville Manufacturing Tooling and Stamping's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332116)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337958425.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.