Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
3,913,242Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: STEVEN PALMIOTTO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of STEVEN PALMIOTTO in 408 MAIN STREET, DANBURY, CT 06810 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 338004815.

Watch Steven Palmiotto — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Steven Palmiotto is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
STEVEN PALMIOTTO
Site address
408 MAIN STREET
City
DANBURY
State
CT
ZIP
06810
Mailing
P.O. BOX 4352, DANBURY, CT 06813
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.    Worksite:  The employer did not ensure that employees were provided with a safe means of access and egress from the carpenter bracket scaffold.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1000
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.    Worksite:  The employer did not ensure that the carpenter bracket scaffold had been erected under the direction and supervision of a competent person.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1400
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold(s) trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize those hazards associated with the type of scaffold(s) being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.    Worksite:  The employer did not ensure that all employees who were required to perform work on a carpenter bracket scaffold had been trained in the hazards associated with the scaffold and the proper ways and procedures to take in order to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     Worksite:  The employer did not ensure that all wall and window openings were equipped with a guardrail or other means to ensure that employees were not exposed to fall hazards while walking and working near them.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1000
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.502 D08

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(8): Horizontal lifelines were not designed, installed, and used under the supervision of a qualified person, as part of a complete personal fall arrest system, which maintained a safety factor of at least two:    Worksite:  The employer did not ensure that the horizontal lifeline, to which employees were tied had been designed and installed by a qualified person and was capable of supporting the employee in the event of a fall.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1400
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338004815.