WATERBURY, CT —
OSHA Inspection: ALFRED XHUTI
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ALFRED XHUTI in 359 HIGHLAND AVE., WATERBURY, CT 06708 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 338023427.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ALFRED XHUTI
- Site address
- 359 HIGHLAND AVE.
- City
- WATERBURY
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06708
- Mailing
- 35 WHEELER FARMS RD., WATERTOWN, CT 06795
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Mar 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns. Worksite: The employee who was working on the ground below the roof eave where debris was falling was not protected from head injuries by the use of a protective helmet.
Recent events (3)
- — D (S) $0
- — C (S) $2200
- — Z (S) $2200
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Mar 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. Worksite: The employees who were installing asphalt roofing shingles with pneumatic nail guns and cutting plywood with a circular saw were not wearing eye protection.
Recent events (3)
- — D (S) $0
- — C (S) $2200
- — Z (S) $2200
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Mar 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,080 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Worksite: The employees who were working on the 12 in 12 pitch roof with an eave height of approximately 24 feet 9 inches above the ground were not protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (3)
- — D (S) $0
- — C (S) $3080
- — Z (S) $3080
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Mar 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. Worksite: The employees who were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 24 feet 9 inches above the ground while working on a 12 in 12 pitch roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — D (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338023427.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.