Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GRAND MACHINE INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GRAND MACHINE INC. in 1700 E GRAND BLVD, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73143 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 338070212.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Grand Machine INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Grand Machine INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GRAND MACHINE INC.
Site address
1700 E GRAND BLVD
City
OKLAHOMA CITY
State
OK
ZIP
73143
Mailing
1700 E GRAND BLVD, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73143
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
24
Ownership type
A

16 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 24 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2013
Abate by
Jul 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of being struck by the load should the overhead hoist, or bridge rail fail:      On or about January 3, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the 2 ton under slung hoist in the west side of the machine shop area had not been inspected, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by falling loads.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.36 D01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 24 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2013
Abate by
Jun 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR1910.36(d)(1): Employees were not able to open an exit route door from the inside without keys, tools, or special knowledge.        On or about January 3, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that exit doors were not locked from the inside with chain and lock in the machine shop and welding shop.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.36 G02

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 24 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2013
Abate by
Jun 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR1910.36(g)(2): Exit accesses were not at least 28 inches wide at all points.    On or about January 3, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that exit access in the machine shop and welding shop was at least 28 inches wide at all points.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.38 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 24 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2013
Abate by
Jul 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.38(b):     An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review:    On or about January 3, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not have a written emergency response plan available in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.106 B06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2013
Abate by
Jun 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(b)(6): In locations where flammable vapors may be present, precautions were not taken to prevent ignition by eliminating or controlling sources of ignition. Sources of ignition may include open flames, lightning, smoking, cutting and welding, hot surfaces, frictional heat, sparks (static, electrical, and mechanical), spontaneous ignition, chemical and physical-chemical reactions, and radiant heat.     On or about January 3, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that flammable vapors were prevented from contact with sources of ignition including open flames and welding in the welding shop.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.101 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2013
Abate by
Jun 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.101(b): The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail cars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks was not in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which is incorporated by reference as specified in CFR 1910.6:  On or about January 3, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that compressed gas cylinders containing acetylene and oxygen were securely stored, exposing employees to the hazard of fire or explosion.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.106 D03 II

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 24 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2013
Abate by
Jun 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(3)(ii): Flammable and combustible liquid storage cabinets were not labeled inconspicuous lettering,  Flammable-Keep Fire Away:  On or about January 3, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that flammable and combustible liquids were stored in cabinets labeled,  Flammable-Keep Fire Away.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.253 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2013
Abate by
Jun 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(1)(ii): Compressed gas cylinders were not legibly marked, for the purpose of identifying the gas content, with either the chemical or the trade name of the gas:  On or about January 3, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that compressed gas cylinders containing acetylene and oxygen stored in the welding shop were labeled to identify the contents, exposing employees to the hazard of fire or explosion.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.176 B

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 24 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2013
Abate by
Jul 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.176(b): Storage of material created a hazard:     On or about January 3, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that stored materials did not create a hazard in the following instances:       Instance 1) Materials including subs that had been machined and subs waiting to be machined were stored unsecured throughout the machine shop exposing employees to the hazard of struck by from of falling materials       Instance 2) Paints and other industrial coatings were stored in the welding shop not within flammable storage cabinets exposing employees to the hazard of fires.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 24 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2013
Abate by
Jul 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6):  The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):       On or about January 3, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that employees operating powered industrial trucks were trained, evaluated, and certified to operate the equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 10 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2013
Abate by
Jul 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, in going nip points, rotating parts, and flying chips:    On or about January 3, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that rotating parts on Kuraki Manual lathes were guarded throughout the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2013
Abate by
Jun 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rests on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:    On or about January 3, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that the work rests of the grinding wheel used in the machine shop were adjusted to a maximum opening of one eighth inch.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.303 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 24 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2013
Abate by
Jun 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electrical equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment:      On or about January 3, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that electrical equipment was accessible in the south east corner of the machine shop.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 24 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2013
Abate by
Aug 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, maintain and/or implement at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria in  29 CFR 1910.1200  (f), (g), and (h) will be met:      On or about January 3, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not keep a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 24 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2013
Abate by
Jul 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employee had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area.     On or about January 3, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the employer did provide employees hazard communication training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.29 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 24 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2013
Abate by
Jul 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $200 Reduced
29 CFR1904.29(a):  The employer did not use an OSHA 300, 300-A, and 301 forms, or equivalent, for recordable injuries and illnesses.      On or about January 3, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not keep OSHA 300, 300-A, and 301 forms for recordable injuries and illnesses
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $200
  • — Z (O) $400

View Grand Machine INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338070212.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.