Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WILCOX TURRET COLD DRAWN

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of WILCOX TURRET COLD DRAWN in 1240 CONTRACT DR., GREEN BAY, WI 54304 (NAICS 331221). OSHA activity number 338089410.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Wilcox Turret Cold Drawn — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Wilcox Turret Cold Drawn is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1240 CONTRACT DR.
City
GREEN BAY
State
WI
ZIP
54304
Mailing
1240 CONTRACT DR., GREEN BAY, WI 54304
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331221
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 28, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1):  The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:    On 01/18/2013, the employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program when employees' noise exposure exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) sound level of 85 dBA:    a)  Pang Born Blast Operator, eastern part of the facility, was exposed to noise at a TWA sound level of 85.7 dBA over a 435 minute sample time.    b)  12F Operator, center of the facility, was exposed to noise at a TWA sound level of 89.6 dBA over a 434 minute sample time.    c)  21F Operator, center of the facility, was exposed to noise at a TWA sound level of 86.5 dBA over a 428 minute sample time.    d)  11F Operator, center of the facility, was exposed to noise at a TWA sound level of 88.2 dBA over a 425 minute sample time.    All provisions of 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o) must be covered in a hearing conservation program. Key elements include, but are not limited, to the following:    1)  Noise level monitoring  2)  Audiometric testing  3)  Wearing of hearing protectors  4)  Training program  5)  Providing copies of standard to employees  6)  Recordkeeping    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.95 G01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 28, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1):  The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels:    a)  On 01/18/2013, the employer did not establish an audiometric testing program by making audiometric testing available to a Pang Born Operator and three Machine operator employees whose exposures to noise exceeded an 8-hour TWA of 85 dBA.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 K01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 28, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1):  The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k). The employer did not institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program:    a)  On 01/18/2013, the employer did not institute a training program, did not ensure employee participation and did not train a Pang Born Operator or three Machine operator employees whose exposure to noise exceeded an 8-hour TWA of 85 dBA in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k).    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 28, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program including the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):     a)  On 01/04/2013, the employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program for employees working with hazardous chemicals in the work area such as, but not limited to oils, lubricants, grease and rust preventative.    All provisions of 29 CFR 1910.1200(e) through (h) must be covered in a written hazard communication program. Key elements include, but are not limited to, the following:    1.  Written program  2.  MSDS collection  3.  Labeling  4.  Employee information and training    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 F06 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 28, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii):  Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical:    a)  On 01/04/2013, the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemical was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the product and its associated hazards for buckets containing oils and solvents located in the electrical room, or for a ketchup bottle containing oil located on the production floor.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 28, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):  The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:    a)  On 01/04/2013, the employer did not verify, through written certification, that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed for employees exposed to flying particles, falling heavy objects, irritating chemicals, hand laceration potential or high levels of noise.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Wilcox Turret Cold Drawn's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338089410.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.