OSHA Inspection: CONSTANTIN PRECISION INSTRUMENTS

Issued

Jan 31, 2013

Abate by

Feb 20, 2013

Penalty

Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced

General-duty citation text

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer does not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards of being struck-by, which are causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees.    a. This violation occurred on or about January 04, 2013, in the mill area next to the CNC CPI303 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when hoisting material using a floor mounted jib crane that did not have rated load markings.     b. This violation occurred on or about January 04, 2013, in the mill area next to the CNC CPI305 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when hoisting material using a floor mounted jib crane that did not have rated load markings.    c. This violation occurred on or about January 04, 2013, in the mill area next to the CNC CPI211 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when hoisting material using a floor mounted jib crane that did not have rated load markings.    d. This violation occurred on or about January 04, 2013, in the mill area where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when hoisting material using floor mounted jib cranes that had not been inspected at frequent intervals and safety deficiencies were present.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation describing the actions it is taking to ensure that employees are not exposed to struck-by hazards.

Issued

Jan 31, 2013

Abate by

Feb 20, 2013

Penalty

Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit".    The employer does not ensure that all emergency exit signs were clearly visible and marked.  This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 in the Machine Shop area where employees were exposed to fire hazards while working without the emergency exits marked or clearly visible.      Pursuant to 29 C.F.R., within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all emergency exits and non-exits are properly identified with signage.

Issued

Jan 31, 2013

Abate by

Apr 15, 2013

Penalty

Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative.    The employer does not ensure that an energy control procedures, training and periodic inspections including specific procedures are developed, documented and implemented to perform lockout/tagout on equipment with multiple sources of energy such as electrical, hydraulic, pneumatic and mechanical energy, before performing maintenance, servicing, and/or setup.    a. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Nigata HN-50B CNC HMC with company Id CPI202.    b. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Nigata HN-50B CNC HMC with company Id CPI211.    c. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Samsung SL25MC CNC LTC with company Id CP308.    d. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up an Ikegaitc25 CNC LTC with company Id CPI301.    e. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Haksui CNC LTC with company Id CPI302.    f. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Takisawa TC-4 CNC LTC with company Id CPI303.    g. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Mori-Seiki SL-35 CNC LTC with company Id CPI304.    h. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Topper TNL-130AL CNC LTC with company Id CPI305.    i. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Mori-Seiki TL-40-3000 CNC LTC with company Id CPI306.    j. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Mori-Seiki SL-45 CNC LTC with company Id CPI307.    k. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Samsung SL45 CNC LTC with company Id CPI309.    l. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Samsung SL35 CNC LTC with company Id CPI310.    m. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Samsung SL45-2 CNC LTC with company Id CPI311.    n. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Karuki MV40 CNC VMC with company Id CPI203.    o. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Yama Seiki VMB-1200 CNC VMC with company Id CPI204.    p. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up an Ares-Seki R510 CNC VMC with company Id CPI206.    q. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up an OKK MCV-550 CNC VMC with company Id CPI207.    r. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Kao Ming 1000 CNC VMC with company Id CPI208.    s. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Shizuoka B-15V CNC VMC with company Id CPI209.    t. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up an OKK MCV-550 CNC VMC with company Id CPI210.    u. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Supermax Max-8 CNC VMC with company Id CPI212.    v. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Big Brother HS EDM Wire with company Id CPI401.    w. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Big Brother HS EDM Wire with company Id CPI402.    x. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Big Brother HS EDM Wire with company Id CPI403.    y. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Hitachi 254Y EDM Wire with company Id CPI404.    z. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Little Brother HS EDM Wire with company Id CPI405.    aa. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and electrical hazards when servicing and/or setting up a Little Brother HS EDM Wire with company Id CPI406.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that an energy control procedures, training and periodic inspections including specific procedures are developed, documented and implemented to perform lockout/tagout on equipment with multiple sources of energy such as electrical, hydraulic, pneumatic and mechanical energy, before performing maintenance, servicing, and/or setup.

Issued

Jan 31, 2013

Abate by

Feb 20, 2013

Penalty

Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks.    The employer does not guard the rotating parts of machines whose operation exposes employees to injury.     a. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Nigata HN-50B CNC HMC with company Id CPI202 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.     b. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Nigata HN-50B CNC HMC with company Id CPI211 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.     c. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Samsung SL25MC CNC LTC with company Id CP308 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.     d. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating an Ikegaitc25 CNC LTC with company Id CPI301 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.     e. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Haksui CNC LTC with company Id CPI302 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.     f. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Takisawa TC-4 CNC LTC with company Id CPI303 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.     g This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Mori-Seiki SL-35 CNC LTC with company Id CPI304 with the interlock for the door guards  disabled.      h. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Topper TNL-130AL CNC LTC with company Id CPI305 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.     i. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Mori-Seiki TL-40-3000 CNC LTC with company Id CPI306 without the interlock for the door guards.     j. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Mori-Seiki SL-45 CNC LTC with company Id CPI307 without the interlock for the door guards.     k. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Samsung SL45 CNC LTC with company Id CPI309 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.     l. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Samsung SL35 CNC LTC with company Id CPI310 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.     m. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Samsung SL45-2 CNC LTC with company Id CPI311 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.     n. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Karuki MV40 CNC VMC with company Id CPI203 without the interlock for the door guards.     o. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Yama Seiki VMB-1200 CNC VMC with company Id CPI204 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.     p. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating an Ares-Seki R510 CNC VMC with company Id CPI206 without the interlock for the door guards.     q. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating an OKK MCV-550 CNC VMC with company Id CPI207 without the interlock for the door guards.     r. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Kao Ming 1000 CNC VMC with company Id CPI208 without the interlock for the door guards.     s. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Shizuoka B-15V CNC VMC with company Id CPI209 without the interlock for the door guards.     t. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating an OKK MCV-550 CNC VMC with company Id CPI210 without the interlock for the door guards.     u. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Supermax Max-8 CNC VMC with company Id CPI212 without the interlock for the door guards.     v. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Big Brother HS EDM Wire with company Id CPI401 without the interlock for the door guards.     w. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Big Brother HS EDM Wire with company Id CPI402 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.     x. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Big Brother HS EDM Wire with company Id CPI403 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.     y. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Hitachi 254Y EDM Wire with company Id CPI404 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.     z. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Little Brother HS EDM Wire with company Id CPI405 without the interlock for the door guards.     aa. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Little Brother HS EDM Wire with company Id CPI406 without the interlock for the door guards.     ab. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 in the mill area where employees were exposed to caught-in and struck-by hazards when operating a metal cutting band saw without guarding in the unused portion of the saw.       Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all machines that have exposed rotating parts are guarded.

Issued

Jan 31, 2013

Abate by

Feb 20, 2013

Penalty

Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving.    The employer does not ensure all machines that are designed to be in a fixed location are securely anchored to prevent employee injury. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, in the mill area where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a bench grinder without securing it to the floor to prevent it from walking or moving.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all machines designed for a fixed location are anchored securely so that they cannot walk or move while in use.

Issued

Jan 31, 2013

Abate by

Feb 26, 2013

Penalty

Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2): Abrasive wheel(s) used on grinding machinery were not provided with safety guard(s) which covered the spindle end, nut, flange projections.    The employer does not ensure that the spindle, nut, and flange on bench grinders are covered with the side guards to prevent employee injury.     Instance a: This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2014 at the North west side of the mill area where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a bench grinder without the side guards.    Instance b: This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2014 at the Central west side of the mill area where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a bench grinder without the side guards.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all bench grinder are equipped with the side guards.

Issued

Jan 31, 2013

Abate by

Feb 20, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work.     The employer does not ensure that the work rests on bench grinders are adjusted with a maximum opening of one-eighth inch to prevent employee injury.     Instance a: This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2014 at the North west side of the mill area where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a bench grinder without work rests.    Instance b: This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2014 at the Central west side of the mill area where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a bench grinder without work rests adjusted properly.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all bench grinder are equipped with work rests and that they are properly adjusted.

Issued

Jan 31, 2013

Abate by

Feb 20, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch.    The employer does not ensure that the tongue guards on bench grinders are adjusted with a maximum opening of one-fourth inch to prevent employee injury.     Instance a: This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2014 at the North west side of the mill area where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a bench grinder without the tongue guards adjusted properly.    Instance b: This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2014 at the Central west side of the mill area where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a bench grinder without the tongue guards adjusted properly.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all bench grinders have their tongue guards adjusted to the grinding wheel with a maximum opening of 1/4th inch.

Issued

Jan 31, 2013

Abate by

Feb 20, 2013

Penalty

Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.    The employer does not ensure that compressed air used for cleaning is reduced to less than 30 p.s.i. This violation was observed on or about January 04, 2013, when employees throughout the facility were exposed to struck-by hazards while blowing off equipment with compressed air that was set to a pressure of 95 p.s.i.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all compressed air used by employees to blow of equipment is reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.

Issued

Jan 31, 2013

Abate by

Feb 20, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.    The employer does not ensure that employees required to operate forklifts are trained and evaluated to ensure they can operate them safely. This violation occurred on or about January 4, 2013, and at times prior thereto, when employees in the facility were required to operate forklifts to move material without being trained and evaluated to ensure they could do so safely.      Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that they provide the employees training consist of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.

Issued

Jan 31, 2013

Abate by

Feb 20, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident.    The employer does not mark the over current device to indicate each breaker's purpose.  This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013 at the facility where employees were unable to identify the purpose of each breaker.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that the over current devices are marked appropriately to indicate each breaker's purpose.

Issued

Jan 31, 2013

Abate by

Feb 20, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(a)(2)(i): Temporary electrical power and lighting installation(s) 600 volts, nominal, or less were used in prohibited manners.     The employer does not ensure that machines being used by employees were installed with permanent wiring.     This condition was observed on or about January 4, 2014 at the facility, where employees were exposed to electrical hazards while working with machines powered by not permanent wiring.     a. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Nigata HN-50B CNC HMC with company Id CPI202 without permanent wiring.    b. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Nigata HN-50B CNC HMC with company Id CPI211 without permanent wiring.    c. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Samsung SL25MC CNC LTC with company Id CP308 without permanent wiring.    d. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating an Ikegaitc25 CNC LTC with company Id CPI301 without permanent wiring.    e. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Haksui CNC LTC with company Id CPI302 without permanent wiring.    f. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Takisawa TC-4 CNC LTC with company Id CPI303 without permanent wiring.    g This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Mori-Seiki SL-35 CNC LTC with company Id CPI304 without permanent wiring.    h. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Topper TNL-130AL CNC LTC with company Id CPI305 without permanent wiring.    i. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Mori-Seiki TL-40-3000 CNC LTC with company Id CPI306 without interlocking door guards.    j. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Mori-Seiki SL-45 CNC LTC with company Id CPI307 without interlocking door guards.    k. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Samsung SL45 CNC LTC with company Id CPI309 without permanent wiring.    l. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Samsung SL35 CNC LTC with company Id CPI310 without permanent wiring.    m. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Samsung SL45-2 CNC LTC with company Id CPI311 without permanent wiring.    n. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Karuki MV40 CNC VMC with company Id CPI203 without interlocking door guards.    o. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Yama Seiki VMB-1200 CNC VMC with company Id CPI204 without permanent wiring.    p. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating an Ares-Seki R510 CNC VMC with company Id CPI206 without interlocking door guards.    q. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating an OKK MCV-550 CNC VMC with company Id CPI207 without interlocking door guards.    r. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Kao Ming 1000 CNC VMC with company Id CPI208 without interlocking door guards.    s. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Shizuoka B-15V CNC VMC with company Id CPI209 without interlocking door guards.    t. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating an OKK MCV-550 CNC VMC with company Id CPI210 without interlocking door guards.    u. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Supermax Max-8 CNC VMC with company Id CPI212 without interlocking door guards.    v. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Big Brother HS EDM Wire with company Id CPI401 without interlocking door guards.    w. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Big Brother HS EDM Wire with company Id CPI402 without permanent wiring.    x. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Big Brother HS EDM Wire with company Id CPI403 without permanent wiring.    y. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Hitachi 254Y EDM Wire with company Id CPI404 without permanent wiring.    z. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Little Brother HS EDM Wire with company Id without permanent wiring.    aa. This violation was observed on or about January 4, 2013, at the facility where employees were operating a Little Brother HS EDM Wire with company Id CPI406 without permanent wiring.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all machines at the facility are installed with permanent wiring.