EAST HANOVER, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: EDUARDO SANTOS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EDUARDO SANTOS in 110 ROUTE 10, EAST HANOVER, NJ 07936 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 338096811.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EDUARDO SANTOS
- Site address
- 110 ROUTE 10
- City
- EAST HANOVER
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07936
- Mailing
- 134 WILSON AVE., NEWARK, NJ 07105
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jan 10, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents a)Employee was exposed to eye injury while using a nailing gun during roofing activities and not wearin any type of eye protection, exposing the employee to an eye injury. Violation observed on or about 12/22/12.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Jan 10, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. a)110 Rt. 10, East Hanover, NJ:Employees conducting roofing activities approximately 30 feet from the ground below were not utilizing any type of fall protection, exposing the employees to fall hazards. Violation observed on or about 12/22/12.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338096811.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.