Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TWIN PEAKS RESTORATION LLC

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of TWIN PEAKS RESTORATION LLC in 1016 EAST BOWMAN STREET, WOOSTER, OH 44691 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 338098213.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Twin Peaks Restoration LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Twin Peaks Restoration LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1016 EAST BOWMAN STREET
City
WOOSTER
State
OH
ZIP
44691
Mailing
6254 BERKEY RD, WEST SALEM, OH 44287
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2013
Abate by
May 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):  The employer did not initiate or maintain an accident prevention program(s) as may be necessary to comply with this part:    On or about December 28, 2012, during construction activities including but not limited to roofing work, the employer did not have a safety and health program implemented at the worksite. The employer did not ensure that employees were provided safety and health training or that there was a system in place to recognize and correct unsafe working conditions.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2800
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2013
Abate by
May 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:    On or about December 28, 2012, during construction activities including but not limited to roofing work, the employer did not ensure a competent person inspected all scaffolds and scaffold components before employees were allowed to begin work.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2800
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 G01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:    On or about December 28, 2012, during construction activities including but not limited to roofing work, the employer did not ensure all employees working on a ladder jack scaffold were protected from fall hazards approximately 19.6 feet by a fall protection system/device.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.452 K04

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(4) Ladders used to support ladder jacks were not placed, fastened, or equipped with devices to prevent slipping:    On or about December 28, 2012, during construction activities including but not limited to roofing work, the employer did not ensure ladders used on ladder jack scaffolds were secured to prevent slipping exposing employees to fall hazards approximately 19.6 feet around the perimeter of the house.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.454 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2013
Abate by
Jun 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area:    On or about December 28, 2012, during construction activities including but not limited to roofing work, the employer did not ensure all employees were properly trained to recognize the hazards associated with work on and from a ladder jack scaffold. Employees were exposed to fall hazards approximately 19.6 feet around the perimeter of the house.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2800
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B13

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     On or about December 28, 2012, during construction activities including but not limited to roofing work, the employer did not ensure all employees on the roof were using a fall protection system/device while exposed to fall hazards approximately 19.6 feet around the perimeter of the house.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1904.39 A

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2013
Abate by
May 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.39(a): The employer did not orally report the death of an employee or the in-patient hospitalization of three or more employees because of a work-related incident    On or about December 28, 2012, during construction activities including but not limited to roofing work, the employer failed to report a work-related death of an employee who fell from a height approximately 19.6 feet.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $5000
  • — Z (O) $5000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338098213.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.