Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SPECIFIC SYSTEMS LTD

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SPECIFIC SYSTEMS LTD in 7655 E. 41ST STREET, TULSA, OK 74145 (NAICS 333415). OSHA activity number 338144017.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Specific Systems LTD — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Specific Systems LTD is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7655 E. 41ST STREET
City
TULSA
State
OK
ZIP
74145
Mailing
7655 E. 41ST STREET, TULSA, OK 74145
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333415
Employees
150
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 E06 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
Mar 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(6)(ii):     Class I flammable liquid(s) were dispensed into containers, vehicles, and equipment without electrically interconnecting the nozzle and the container, vehicles, or equipment:    On or about January 8, 2013, and at times prior thereto, in the paint areas Isopropyl Alcohol 99% + having flashpoint of 53 degrees F and used paint and flammable liquids were dispensed from one container into another container without being effectively grounded and bonded to electrically interconnect the containers to prevent static discharge during dispensing operation exposing employees to a fire hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1620
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.107 E02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
Mar 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(e)(2):     Quantity. The quantity of flammable liquids or liquids with a flashpoint greater than 199.4 �F (93 �C) kept in the vicinity of spraying operations exceeded a supply for 1 day or one shift. Bulk storage of portable containers of flammable liquids or liquids with a flashpoint greater than 199.4 �F (93 �C) shall be in a separate, constructed building detached from other important buildings or cut off in a standard manner.      On or about January 8, 2013, and at times prior thereto, in the spray booth area the quantity of flammable liquids kept in the area of spraying operation exceeded a supply for one day or one shift.  Employees were exposed to fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1620
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.107 G05

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
Apr 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(5):     Cleaning solvents. The use of solvents for cleaning operations were not restricted to those having flashpoints not less than 100 deg. F. or the solvents having flashpoints not less than those normally used in the spray operation:.    On or about November 7, 2011, and at times prior thereto, in the spray paint areas employees were using Isopropyl Alcohol 99% + having flashpoint of 53 degrees F as a solvent for cleaning operations.  This exposes employees to fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
Apr 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i):     Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:      On or about January 8, 2013, and at times prior thereto, at the establishment the employer did not develop and document step-by-step lock-out/tag-out procedures for the control of potentially hazardous energy of specific equipment when employees were engaged in maintenance and testing operations.  Employees were exposed to unexpected release of energy hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
Apr 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i):     The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:      On or about January 8, 2011, and at times prior thereto, at the establishment the employer had employees performing maintenance and testing operations that require lock-out/tag-out equipment.  However, the employer did not conduct periodic inspection of the procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure was effective and being followed.  Employees were exposed to unexpected release of energy hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 B05 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
Apr 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i):     There were no visible gauge(s), audible alarm(s) or pressure activated device(s) installed on paint spray booth(s) to indicate or insure that the required air velocity was maintained:      On or about January 8, 2013, and at times prior thereto, at the spray booth area the booth was operated without a proper device to indicate that the required air velocity was maintained.  Employees may be exposed to a flammable atmosphere or toxic vapors when the spray booth is not maintained with the required air velocity through the filter media.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
Mar 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):     The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:      On or about January 8, 2013, and at time prior thereto, at the facility the employer did not provide medical evaluation to determine employee's ability to use a respirator prior to allowing employees to wear respirator in the workplace.  Without prior medical evaluation employees were exposed to possible respiratory difficulty while wearing a respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Specific Systems LTD's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338144017.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.