Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: STAPLES PRINT SOLUTIONS WAREHOUSE

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of STAPLES PRINT SOLUTIONS WAREHOUSE in 601 I-45 SOUTH, HUTCHINS, TX 75141 (NAICS 453210). OSHA activity number 338191612.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Staples Print Solutions Warehouse for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Staples Print Solutions Warehouse is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
601 I-45 SOUTH
City
HUTCHINS
State
TX
ZIP
75141
Mailing
601 I-45 SOUTH, HUTCHINS, TX 75141
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
453210
Employees
90
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2013
Abate by
May 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,500 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(b)(2): Permanent aisles and passageways were not appropriately marked:      The employer does not mark permanent aisles and passageways. This violation most recently occurred on February 08, 2013, where pedestrian employees and forklift operators used the same aisles and passageways that were not marked.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $2000
  • · Z (S) $5500

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2013
Abate by
May 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $6,600 · Current $2,000 Reduced
1910.132 (d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):                                                                                                                      This violation was discovered on February 08, 2013, where the employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $2000
  • · Z (S) $6600

1910.215 A04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2013
Abate by
Apr 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,500 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one-eight inch:                                                                                                        This violation was discovered on January 09, 2013, at a workplace located at 601 Interstate 45 South in Hutchins, Texas; in the pref storage area, where at least one (1) employee used a bench grinder that had the work rest(s) not adjusted to maximum opening of one-eight inch.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $5000
  • · Z (S) $5500

1910.215 B09

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2013
Abate by
Apr 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The maximum angular exposure above the horizontal plane of the wheel spindle as specified in paragraphs (b)(3) and (4) of this section was exceeded, and the distance between the wheel periphery and the adjustable tongue or the end of the peripheral member at the top exceeded one-fourth inch:                                                                                                         This violation was discovered on January 09, 2013, at a workplace located at 601 Interstate 45 South in Hutchins, Texas; in the pref storage area, where at least one (1) employee used a bench grinder that did not have the adjustable tongue guards adjusted  to one-fourth inch.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338191612.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.