Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WEATHERFORD US LP

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of WEATHERFORD US LP in 961 INDUSTRIAL PARK DR, VICTORIA, TX 77905 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 338197411.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Weatherford US LP — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Weatherford US LP is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
WEATHERFORD US LP
Site address
961 INDUSTRIAL PARK DR
City
VICTORIA
State
TX
ZIP
77905
Mailing
PO BOX 5342, KINGSVILLE, TX 78363
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
213112
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2013
Abate by
Aug 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,550 · Current $1,275 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2):     Where wet processes were used, drainage was not maintained, and false floors, platforms, mats, or other dry standing places were not provided when practicable:    In front of the Q/C Lab Building and adjacent to the Office trailer, the employer did not address standing pad runoff water.  The employer failed to address drainage or provide temporary raised walkway (blocks, stands).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1275
  • — Z (S) $2550

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2013
Abate by
Aug 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c):     Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    At this site, employees were not provided with an emergency eye wash adequate to the nature of chemicals being handled and transported in accordance with American National Standards Institute ANSI Standard Z358.1 (2009) guidelines.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.303 B01 VIII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2013
Abate by
Aug 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $2,125 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1)(viii):     Other factors that contribute to the practical safeguarding of persons using or likely to come in contact with the equipment:    In the Q/C Lab Building, employees performing lab work and quality control testing worked around a wet sink area and 120 volt equipment without ground-fault crcuit interrupter (GFCI) protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2125
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.303 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2013
Abate by
Aug 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident:  Inside the Q/C Lab Building, the 120 volt wall breaker panel did not have labeled switches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 B02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2013
Abate by
Aug 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $2,125 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i):     Each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy:    At the east bay door of the Warehouse, an outlet box with live conductors at 120 volts was left loose and without a cover.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2125
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.1200 F06 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2013
Abate by
Aug 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii):   Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical:  At the back tank farm, three vertical diesel storage tanks (D2, D3) exhibited degraded labeling from weathering and no hazard class information, including but not limited to, an NFPA 704 diamond.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Weatherford US LP's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338197411.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.