WEST PALM BEACH, FL —
OSHA Inspection: ZACHRY INDUSTRIAL, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ZACHRY INDUSTRIAL, INC. in 5904 N FLAGLER DRIVE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33407 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 338206618.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ZACHRY INDUSTRIAL, INC.
- Site address
- 5904 N FLAGLER DRIVE
- City
- WEST PALM BEACH
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33407
- Mailing
- 527 LOGWOOD, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78221
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- Employees
- 1000
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.1126 H05
- Issued
- Mar 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,805 · Current $0 Reduced
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1126(h)(5): Prohibited activities. The employer did not ensure that employees do not eat, drink, smoke, chew tobacco or gum, or apply cosmetics in areas where skin or eye contact with chromium (VI) occurs; or carry the products associated with these activities, or store such products in these areas: On or about 1/23/13, at the above address jobsite, an employee was allowed to smoke while exposed to chromium VI during welding operations.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $0
- — C (S) $2805
- — Z (S) $2805
1926.1126 I02 I
- Issued
- Mar 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,805 · Current $2,000 Reduced
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1126(i)(2)(i): The employer did not provide a medical examination within 30 days after initial assignment, and/or the employee had not received a chromium (VI)-related medical examination that met the requirements of 29 CFR 1926.1126(i), within the last twelve months: On or about 1/23/13, at the above address jobsite, employees did not receive a medical examination after initial assignment of welding operations that involved exposure to chromium VI.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $2000
- — C (S) $2805
- — Z (S) $2805
1926.1126 D03
- Issued
- Mar 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $935 · Current $0 Reduced
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1126(d)(3): The employer did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee on the basis of any combination of air monitoring data, historical monitoring data, or objective data sufficient to accurately characterize employee exposure to chromium (VI): On or about 1/23/13, at the above address, the employer had not determined the 8 hour time-weighted average for employees exposed to chromium VI while conducting welding operations.
Recent events (3)
- — R (O) $0
- — C (O) $935
- — Z (O) $935
1926.1126 D04 I
- Issued
- Mar 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1126(d)(4)(i): Within 5 working days after making an exposure determination in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.1126(d)(2) or 29 CFR 1926.1126(d)(3), the employer either did not post the results in an appropriate location that was accessible to all affected employees, or did not notify each affected employee individually in writing of the results: On or about 1/23/13, at the above address jobsite, employees monitored for exposure to chromium VI while conducting welding operations were not informed of the results.
Recent events (3)
- — R (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 K05 II
- Issued
- Mar 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(5)(ii): Retraining was not conducted when inadequacies in the employee's knowledge or use of the respirator indicated that the employee did not retain the necessary training or skill: (Construction Reference 1926.103)(a) On or about 1/10/13, at the above address jobsite, employees observed wearing their respirators on their elbows were not retrained by the employer.
Recent events (3)
- — R (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1926.1126 H04 I
- Issued
- Mar 18, 2013
- Abate by
- May 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1126(h)(4)(i): When the employer allowed employees to consume food or beverages at a worksite where chromium (VI) was present; and the employer did not ensure that the eating and drinking areas were maintained as free as practicable of chromium (VI): On or about 1/23/13, at the above address jobsite, the lunch room tables were not free of chromium VI.
Recent events (3)
- — R (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1926.1126 K01 II E
- Issued
- Mar 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1126(k)(1)(ii)(E): The record of all measurements taken to monitor employee exposure to chromium VI did not include types of personal protective equipment, such as respirators worn: On or about 1/23/13, at the above address jobsite, the employer did not accurately include the type of respirator worn in their sampling data records.
Recent events (3)
- — R (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Zachry Industrial, INC.
View Zachry Industrial, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338206618.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.