FORT LAUDERDALE, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: PAINT CITY SERVICE CORP.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PAINT CITY SERVICE CORP. in 101 S. FT. LAUDERDALE BLVD., FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 338224819.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PAINT CITY SERVICE CORP.
- Site address
- 101 S. FT. LAUDERDALE BLVD.
- City
- FORT LAUDERDALE
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33316
- Mailing
- 1270 NE 155TH ST., NORTH MIAMI BEACH, FL 33162
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238320
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Mar 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift: On or about January 10, 2013, at the above job site, an employee was inside of an aerial lift without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Mar 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: On or about January 10, 2013, at the above job site, an employee was on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side and not wearing any fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Mar 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about January 10, 2013, at the above job site, an employee was not knowledgeable in recognizing fall hazards while straddling the ledge of a structure.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238320)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338224819.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.