Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SOARING EAGLE WATERPARK AND HOTEL

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SOARING EAGLE WATERPARK AND HOTEL in 5665 E. PICKARD ST, MOUNT PLEASANT, MI 48858 (NAICS 721120). OSHA activity number 338234214.

Watch Soaring Eagle Waterpark AND Hotel — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Soaring Eagle Waterpark AND Hotel is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5665 E. PICKARD ST
City
MOUNT PLEASANT
State
MI
ZIP
48858
Mailing
5665 E. PICKARD ST, MOUNT PLEASANT, MI 48858
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
721120
Employees
350
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2550.00 · Current $1785.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):  A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    On or about January 14, 2013, employees were required to wear tight fitting half-face air purifying respirators while replacing empty muriatic acid barrels with full barrels, and a written respiratory protection program had not been established.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2550

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    On or about January 14, 2013, employees were required to wear tight fitting half-face air purifying respirators while replacing empty muriatic acid barrels with full barrels, and the employer had not provided medical evaluations to determine the employees' ability to use a respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):    On or about January 14, 2013, employees were required to wear tight fitting half-face air purifying respirators while replacing empty muriatic acid barrels with full barrels, and the employer did not ensure that employees passed a qualitative or quantitative fit test.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H04 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(4)(i): Respirators that failed an inspection or were otherwise found to be defective were not removed from service and discarded or repaired only by persons appropriately trained to perform such operations:    On or about January 14, 2013, employees were required to wear tight fitting half-face air purifying respirators while replacing empty muriatic acid barrels with full barrels, and a defective North 5500 respirator had not been removed from service and discarded or repaired by an appropriately trained person.  The respirator's original inhalation valve had been replaced by a piece of a nitrile glove.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:    On or about January 14, 2013, employees were required to wear tight fitting half-face air purifying respirators while replacing empty muriatic acid barrels with full barrels, and the employer had not provided respiratory protection training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338234214.