Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GERRITY INDUSTRIES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GERRITY INDUSTRIES in 152 BOG ROAD, LEEDS, ME 04263 (NAICS 321920). OSHA activity number 338252612.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gerrity Industries — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gerrity Industries is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GERRITY INDUSTRIES
Site address
152 BOG ROAD
City
LEEDS
State
ME
ZIP
04263
Mailing
P.O. BOX 121, MONMOUTH, ME 04259
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
321920
Employees
44
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Feb 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $2,380 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1):     Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:    Mill, Outside MCC - A midrail and toeboards were not provided on the platform at the top of the stairway.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2380
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Feb 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $2,380 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii):     An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:    Establishment - An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not conducted and documented at least once every three years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2380
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.213 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Feb 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $2,380 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(h)(1):     The sides of the lower exposed portion of the blade of radial saw(s) were not guarded to the full diameter of the blade by a device that automatically adjusted itself to the thickness of the stock and remained in contact with the stock being cut to give maximum protection possible for the operation being performed:     Hand Nail Room - The sides of the lower exposed portion of the blade of the Dewalt radail saw was not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2380
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.213 H04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Feb 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.213(h)(4):     Radial saw(s) were not installed in a manner so as to cause the cutting head to return gently to the starting position when released by the operator:    Hand Nail Room - The cutting head of the Dewalt radial saw did not return to the starting position when released by the operator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Feb 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,428 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b):     Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:      a)  Hand Nail Room - The compressed air used for cleaning the work tables was not reduced to less than 30 psi static pressure at the end of the nozzle.    b)  Remanufacturing Room - The compressed air used for cleaning the pop-up saw was not reduced to less than 30 psi static pressure at the end of the nozzle.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1428
  • — Z (S) $1785

1910.335 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Mar 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $2,380 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1):     Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with, and did not use, electrical protective equipment that is appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed:    Establishment - Empoyees exposed to electrical shock and arc flash hazards while performing diagnostic work on live electrical parts, verifying the absence of voltage for work on de-energized electrical parts, and resetting switches in electrical panels up to and including 480 volts were not provided with and did not use electrical protective equipment appropriate for the task.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2380
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.332 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Mar 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1):     Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments:    Establishment - Employees who were exposed to the hazards of electrical shock and arc flash were not trained in and familiar with the use and care of electrical protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 44 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Feb 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,428 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    Establishment - Employees were not provided information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1428
  • — Z (S) $1785

1910.1200 E01 I

Serious 1 instance 44 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Feb 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i):     The written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present, using an identity that was referenced on the appropriate material safety data sheet:    Establishment - The written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Feb 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(ii):     The employer did not certify that periodic inspections of the energy control procedures had been performed:    Establishment - The employer did not certify that periodic inspections of the energy control procedures had been performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Feb 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1):     Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:    Maintenance Area, Compressor Room - A BC Dry Chemical 20 pound fire extinguisher was not mounted.  A hanger was not provided at the fire extinguisher's designated location.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338252612.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.