JERSEY CITY, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: IBRAHIM M. IBRAHIM, CO.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of IBRAHIM M. IBRAHIM, CO. in 33 SUMMIT AVE, JERSEY CITY, NJ 07304 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 338256027.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- IBRAHIM M. IBRAHIM, CO.
- Site address
- 33 SUMMIT AVE
- City
- JERSEY CITY
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07304
- Mailing
- 33 SUMMIT AVE, JERSEY CITY, NJ 07304
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 20, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: a) 33 Summit Ave, Jersey City, NJ. Employer did not develop an accident prevention program, thereby exposing his employees to hazards including but not limited to missing handrail, unprotected rebar, and fall from makshift work platform. Violation observed on or about 01/09/2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 20, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: a) 33 Summit Ave, Jersey City, NJ. Employees were not trained to recognize hazards associated with scaffolds. Hazards that were observed with the employees working on the pole scaffold, which included, but were not limited to inadequate fall protection, and erected next to an energized power line. Violation observed on or about 01/09/2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 20, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards: a) 33 Summit Ave, Jersey City, NJ. Employee was not properly trained as to the proper setting, securing and use of stairways. This was evident by employees walking up and down stairway that was missing hardrail, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazard. Violation observed on or about 01/09/2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 F06
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(6): Scaffolds were erected, used, dismantled, altered, or moved such that they, or any conductive material handled on them, could have come closer than the minimum distances established for specific voltages as set forth in the table in subparagraph (f)(6).Note: Specify distances as indicated in table in paragraph (f)(6) of this section. a) 33 Summit Ave, Jersey City, NJ. Employees were working from a pole scaffold that was erected approximately inches from a energized power line, thereby exposing the employees to possible shock hazard. Violation observed on or about 01/09/2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.701 B
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.701(b): All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and/or into which employees could fall or come against, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement: a) 33 Summit Ave, Jersey City, NJ. Piece of vertical re-bar at the ground level was not guarded. Employees were walking/working up and dow the stairs in the area were exposed to the hazard of being impaled. Violation observed on or about 01/09/2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1052 C01 II
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge: a) 33 Summit Ave, Jersey City, NJ. Employer and his employees were observed walking up and down the stairway that was missing handrails, thereby exposing his employees to a unprotected rebar at the lower level. Violation observed on or about 01/09/2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338256027.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.