FORT WORTH, TX —
OSHA Inspection: SOLIDIFORM, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SOLIDIFORM, INC. in 3928 LAWNWOOD, FORT WORTH, TX 76111 (NAICS 331524). OSHA activity number 338296429.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SOLIDIFORM, INC.
- Site address
- 3928 LAWNWOOD
- City
- FORT WORTH
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76111
- Mailing
- P. O. BOX 7656, FORT WORTH, TX 76111
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331524
- Employees
- 37
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 6, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,925 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck by and crushed by hazards. On or about January 15, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that frequent and periodic inspections of the hoists were being performed: a) In the wax injection room, employees operated a 1 ton DEMAG crane and components hoist b) In the shell department, employees operated two 1 ton R&M Loadmate LM10 hoists
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1925
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- May 6, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,155 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading EXIT: On or about January 15, 2013, and at times prior thereto, employees working in the Shell Department area were exposed to entrapment and fire hazards where the employer did not ensure that the exit route door was identified with an exit sign.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1155
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.37 B04
- Issued
- May 6, 2013
- Abate by
- May 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(4): Signs were not posted along the exit access indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge when the direction of travel to the exit or exit discharge was not immediately apparent: On or about January 15, 2013, and at times prior thereto, employees working in the warehouse were exposed to entrapment and fire hazards were the employer did not ensure that all exit discharge routes were immediately apparent or identified with directional arrows, signs or directional aids.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.37 B06
- Issued
- May 6, 2013
- Abate by
- May 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(6): Each exit sign was not illuminated to a surface value of at least five foot-candles (54 lux) by a reliable light source and be distinctive in color: On or about January 15, 2013, the employer did not ensure that the exit route door light was illuminated in the shipping and receiving department. Employees were exposed to entrapment and fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- May 6, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,070 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): On or about January 15, 2013, and at times prior thereto, employees operating the Tannewitz metal cutting band saw were not protected from struck by hazards: a) The blade guard was not being adjusted to the height of the material being cut b) The 4 inch gap in the saw housing exposed the blade next to the on/off switch and work table
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2070
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- May 6, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,925 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): On or about January 15, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure guards were installed on two CENCO vacuum pump pulleys. Employees were exposed to amputation and caught-in hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1925
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.219 E01 I
- Issued
- May 6, 2013
- Abate by
- May 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i): Horizontal belts which had both runs seven feet or less from the floor level were not guarded with a guard that extended to at least fifteen inches above the belt: On or about January 15, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that guards were installed around the CENCO vacuum pump pulley belt exposing employees to amputation and in-going nip point hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.305 B01 II
- Issued
- May 6, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,925 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed: On or about January 15, 2013 and at times prior thereto, and at times prior thereto, in the finishing department next to the waster fountain, the employer did not ensure that an unused opening in a receptacle gang box was closed to protect the employees from electrocution and fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1925
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.305 J02 IV
- Issued
- May 6, 2013
- Abate by
- May 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(j)(2)(iv): A receptacle installed in a wet or damp location was not suitable for the location: On or about January 15, 2013, and at times prior thereto, employees using the drinking fountains were exposed to electrocution hazards where the employer did not ensure electrical receptacles were suitable in the following wet locations: a) In the foundry investment hallway a 120 volt 4 way metal electric receptacle gang box was located above the water fountain drinking area. b) In the finishing department next to the exit door a 120 volt 4 way metal electric receptacle gang box was located next to the water fountain.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Solidiform, INC.
View Solidiform, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331524)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338296429.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.