Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SUPERIOR SPRING & MFG., CO., INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SUPERIOR SPRING & MFG., CO., INC. in 2300 STATE STREET, HAMDEN, CT 06517 (NAICS 811111). OSHA activity number 338302813.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Superior Spring & MFG., CO., INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Superior Spring & MFG., CO., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2300 STATE STREET
City
HAMDEN
State
CT
ZIP
06517
Mailing
2300 STATE STREET, HAMDEN, CT 06517
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811111
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 A06

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2013
Abate by
May 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The user shall see that all nameplates and markings are in place and are maintained in a legible condition.    WORKSHOP:      1.  The nameplate of the Nissan powered industrial truck (PIT) was not legible.  2.  No marking or nameplate on the Hyster powered industrial truck (PIT).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2013
Abate by
May 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): If at any time a powered industrial truck is found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe, the truck shall be taken out of service until it has been restored to safe operating condition.    WORKSHOP:  The left front light of the Yale powered industrial truck was not operable.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2013
Abate by
May 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(f)(2): The storage and handling of liquefied petroleum gas fuel shall be in accordance with NFPA Storage and Handling of Liquefied Petroleum Gases (NFPA No. 58-1969), which is incorporated by reference as specified in Sec. 1910.6.    WORKSHOP:  The left clamp on the propane tank of the Clark powered industrial truck (PIT) was missing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2013
Abate by
May 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance shall be conducted at least once every three years.    WORKSHOP:  The employer had not evaluated the performance of the powered industrial truck (PIT) operators at least once every three years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2013
Abate by
May 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): Certification. The employer shall certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l). The certification shall include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation.    WORKSHOP:  The employer had not ensured through a written certification that the powered industrial truck operator were appropriately trained and evaluated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2013
Abate by
May 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Exposure adjustment. Safety guards of the types described in Subparagraphs (3) and (4) of this paragraph, where the operator stands in front of the opening, shall be constructed so that the peripheral protecting member can be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel. The maximum angular exposure above the horizontal plane of the wheel spindle as specified in paragraphs (b)(3) and (4) of this section shall never be exceeded, and the distance between the wheel periphery and the adjustable tongue or the end of the peripheral member at the top shall never exceed one-fourth inch. (See Figures O-18, O-19, O-20, O-21, O-22, and O-23.)    WORKSHOP:  The right abrasive wheel of the red grinder, unknown identification was not equipped with a tongue guard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.219 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2013
Abate by
May 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Projecting shaft ends shall present a smooth edge and end and shall not project more than one-half the diameter of the shaft unless guarded by nonrotating caps or safety sleeves.    WORKSHOP:  The left rotating horizontal shaft end of the red grinder, unknown identification was not equipped guard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2013
Abate by
May 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). If such hazards are present, or likely to be present, the employer shall:    WORKSHOP:  The employer had not conducted the Workplace Hazard Assessment to determine the necessitate and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2013
Abate by
May 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of this section, shall be provided by the employer in any written or oral format, to employees who wear respirators when such use is not required by this section or by the employer.    WORKSHOP:  The employer had not provided the employees who optionally wore double strapped dust masks with Appendix D of the respiratory protection standard for the employees performing grinding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2013
Abate by
May 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in the work area at the time of the initail assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into the work area:    WORKSHOP:  The employees were not all provided with training and information in the hazard communication program who were required to work with chemicals, such as (but not limited to) welding gases, oils and grease.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Superior Spring & MFG., CO., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338302813.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.