ATLANTA, GA —
OSHA Inspection: MAX COATING, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MAX COATING, INC. in 170 SELIG DRIVE, ATLANTA, GA 30336 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 338330418.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAX COATING, INC.
- Site address
- 170 SELIG DRIVE
- City
- ATLANTA
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30336
- Mailing
- 170 SELIG DRIVE, ATLANTA, GA 30336
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332812
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 D01 III
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- May 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(d)(1)(iii): Stairway(s) less than 44 inches wide having both sides open, did not have one stair railing on each side: a) In the powder coating department - The stairway leading to the catwalk did not have a stair railing on the right hand side. Employees access the stairs to repair the coating line and to remove any blockages, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1260
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- May 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Throughout the facility -The employer did not provide a medical evaluation for employees required to wear the 3M NIOSH air purifying respirators and 2300 N95 dust masks, exposing employees to respiratory tract irritation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 F
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- May 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f): The employee was required to use a respirator without being fit tested with the same make, model, style and size of respirator that was to be used: a) Throughout the facility - The employer did not provide fit testing for employees using 3M NIOSH air purifying respirators and 2300 N95 dust masks, exposing employees to respiratory tract irritation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- May 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: a) Throughout the facility - The employer did not provide any information and training regarding the proper use of respirators to employees required to wear 3M NIOSH air purifying respirators and 2300 N95 dust masks, exposing employees to respiratory tract irritation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- May 8, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: a) In the powder coating department - The employer did not maintain a material safety data sheet for employees utilizing the Lubecon Series I/M 200 Lubricant, which was used to lubricate the chains of conveyors, exposing employees to the eye, skin, and respiratory tract irritations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at MAX Coating, INC.
View MAX Coating, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332812)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338330418.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.