O FALLON, IL —
OSHA Inspection: JIM CLARK
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JIM CLARK in 116 SUNNYSIDE, O FALLON, IL 62269 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 338333826.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JIM CLARK
- Site address
- 116 SUNNYSIDE
- City
- O FALLON
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62269
- Mailing
- 1909 WEIL RD., TROY, IL 62294
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. a) For Citation 1, Item 1, issued on 2/15/2013 with an abatement date of 3/14/2013, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation. b) For Citation 1, Item 2, issued on 2/15/2013 with an abatement date of 2/22/2013, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation. c) For Citation 1, Item 3, issued on 2/15/2013 with an abatement date of 2/22/2013, the employer did not certify the complete abatementof the cited violation.
Recent events (2)
- — A (O) $0
- — Z (O) $400
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers. Employees working from a 8 in 12 pitch roof were exposed to falls of approximately 8 feet to a lower level. The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $2400
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. Employees working from an 8 in 12 pitch roof were exposed to falls of approximately 8 feet to a lower level. Employees were not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or a personal fall arrest systems or any other approved means.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1440
- — C (S) $2400
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support. An extension ladder to access work on the roof did not extend three feet above the upper landing surface nor were there any grasping device, such as a grab rail to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 8 feet to a lower level.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1440
- — C (S) $2400
- — Z (S) $2400
More inspections at JIM Clark
View JIM Clark's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338333826.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.