Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JACK CONSTRUCTION LLC

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of JACK CONSTRUCTION LLC in 960 COLLIER BLVD. NORTH, NAPLES, FL 34120 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 338365885.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jack Construction LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jack Construction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
960 COLLIER BLVD. NORTH
City
NAPLES
State
FL
ZIP
34120
Mailing
27110 ENCLAVE DR., BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2013
Abate by
Apr 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1):  Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):    a. On or about January 14, 2013 at the above addressed job site, a fabricated frame scaffold was not fully planked.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1440
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.    a.  On or about January 14, 2013 at the above addressed job site, employees were working on a fabricated frame scaffold which was not equipped with access ladders.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2013
Abate by
Apr 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(1): Scaffold and/or scaffold components were loaded in excess of their maximum intended loads or rated capacities, whichever was less:    a. On or about January 14, 2013 at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while standing on cross bracing and guardrails of a scaffold while installing metal framing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:    a. On or about January 14, 2013 at the above addressed job site, employees had worked on a fabricated frame scaffold that had not been inspected by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2013
Abate by
Apr 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a):  The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold(s) trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize those hazards associated with the type of scaffold(s) being used and to understand the  procedures to control or minimize those hazards:    a.  On or about January 14, 2013 at the above addressed job site, the employer did not provide training to employees that enabled them to recognize the hazards associated with the use of scaffolds and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards for employees who had been working on a scaffold that lacked planking and access ladders.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1440
  • — Z (S) $2400

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338365885.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.