Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ROYAL CASE COMPANY

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROYAL CASE COMPANY in 419 E. LAMAR, SHERMAN, TX 75090 (NAICS 332313). OSHA activity number 338385859.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Royal Case Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Royal Case Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ROYAL CASE COMPANY
Site address
419 E. LAMAR
City
SHERMAN
State
TX
ZIP
75090
Mailing
419 E. LAMAR, SHERMAN, TX 75090
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332313
Employees
153
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C06 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 100 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2013
Abate by
Mar 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(ii):  The employer did not ensure that the periodic inspections were adequately performed. The certification did not identify all of the employees included in the inspection, and the person performing the inspection.    On or about January 17, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not perform adequate periodic inspections on each piece of equipment which would require lockout/tagout of energy sources.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 100 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2013
Abate by
Mar 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i):  The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees.    On or about January 17, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide adequate training to all employees who might be exposed to crushing or amputation hazards while working on or around equipment which might nessisitate locking out or tagging out.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $4500

1904.40 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 150 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2013
Abate by
Feb 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $450 · Current $270 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.40(a):   The employer did not provide copies of OSHA 300 Logs within four (4) business hours.    On or about January 17, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the employer was not able to provide copies of their OSHA 300 Logs within four (4) business hours.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $270
  • — Z (O) $450

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338385859.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.