MAKAWAO, HI —
OSHA Inspection: HAWAIIAN TELCOM
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of HAWAIIAN TELCOM in MEHA AND HANAMU ROAD, MAKAWAO, HI 96768 (NAICS 517110). OSHA activity number 338392236.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HAWAIIAN TELCOM
- Site address
- MEHA AND HANAMU ROAD
- City
- MAKAWAO
- State
- HI
- ZIP
- 96768
- Mailing
- 1170 BISHOP STREET, HONOLULU, HI 96813
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 517110
- Employees
- 200
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.67 C02 II
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.67(c)(2)(ii): An employee(s) operating an aerial lift(s) was not properly trained: Employees operated an aerial lift (Boom Truck) and were never trained by the employer to operate the specific equipment. This violation was discovered on or about 02/12/2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.67 C02 V
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $4,725
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.67(c)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and a lanyard attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: This violation occurred on or about January 17, 2013 where an employee worked from an aerial lift without wearing a body belt or harness attached to the boom or basket with a lanyard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4725
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 D
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which would have necessitated the use of personal protective equipment: The violation was discovered on or about 02/12/2013 when employees used gas-powered chain saws and the employer did not provide safety gear or personal protective equipment (PPE) for their use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment. The violation was discovered on or about 02/12/2013 when employees were using gas-powered chain saws and not wearing eye and face protection because the employer did not privide them.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 517110)
More inspections in HI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338392236.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.