SAINT AUGUSTINE, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: STEJAN CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of STEJAN CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 35 PALOMINO WAY, SAINT AUGUSTINE, FL 32095 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 338403447.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STEJAN CONSTRUCTION, INC.
- Site address
- 35 PALOMINO WAY
- City
- SAINT AUGUSTINE
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32095
- Mailing
- 1637 UPPER 4TH AVENUE NORTH, JACKSONVILLE BEACH, FL 32250
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: (a) On or about January 22, 2013, employees that operated the pneumatic nailers did not use eye protection, being exposed to flying nails and or other foreign objects.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) On or about January 22, 2013, on the 6:12 pitch roof employees were working without the use of a complete fall protection system, being exposed to a 19 feet 2-inch fall hazard. (b) On or about January 22, 2013, between the trusses of the front entry gable an employee was working without the use of a complete fall protection system, being exposed to a 9 feet 9-inch fall hazard. (c) On or about January 22, 2013, employees working on the 2nd floor at the east side entry area where no wall had been framed in, being exposed to a 10 feet 6-inch fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338403447.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.